[kkindt]

reality is that Davis was not given a chance to be one of those considered by the electorate. This is not fair.

Just because he got rejected say by 49% doesn't mean he shouldn't have been given a chance to run against the field of other candidates.

[pgyanke]

reality is that Davis was not given a chance to be one of those considered by the electorate. This is not fair.

What are you smoking?! He was given more than a fair chance by the electorate... he is the incumbent... he ran unopposed in the first part of the ballot... rather than keep his rat butt in office, HE WAS FIRED! Being a candidate to replace himself makes no sense!

[.38sw]

reality is that Davis was not given a chance to be one of those considered by the electorate. This is not fair.

WHAT?!! He had full consideration by the electorate in question number 1. He was rejected by just a hair under 55% of those who voted - 60% of registered voters. Only 40% of registered voters voted in Nov. 2002, and of those, only 48% voted FOR Grayout Doofus. Arnold got more votes in this election than Doofus got in 2002. I'd say it was more than fair.

[cyncooper]

reality is that Davis was not given a chance to be one of those considered by the electorate. This is not fair.

He certainly was.

They could have voted NO on the recall question.

And why do you keep harping on the recall vote being 51/49? It was not. He was rejected by a huge margin and not your plucked-out-of-thin-air ratio.