To: .cnI redruM
They said they sold him 11,900 tablets over six months in 2001.What? That is about 66 pills a day if Rush was using. Or, 33 a day if he and his wife were using. I believe they would not have survived that.
So, now the Rush haters will say he was selling??
I do not blame Rush for staying quiet (per his lawyers instruction no doubt). Something is not right with this scenario.
Let the news percolate for a few more days or weeks. Give the Rush hatersmore rope. Then hang um!!
Would it not be sweet if it is found these terrible excuses for humans were put up to this by the DNC (McAwful)??
To: technomage
Just a few little lies. No harm done. Let's move on.
18 posted on
10/03/2003 9:57:32 AM PDT by
AMNZ
To: technomage
Would it not be sweet if it is found these terrible excuses for humans were put up to this by the DNC (McAwful)??Unless the story is false I don't see what difference it makes who was behind the probe. Are only republicans allowed to investigate republicans?
19 posted on
10/03/2003 9:58:18 AM PDT by
steve50
(The only good drug addicts are rich drug addicts)
To: technomage
With all of the strange news this week, my brain can't seem to retrieve any of the names of celebrities (and there are many) who have been "exposed" by the National Enquirer over the years.
Many of these are victims of complete lies and have won major lawsuits against the magazine. Just wish I could think of who they are.
Is it possible that this is just such an "exposee?"
21 posted on
10/03/2003 10:03:42 AM PDT by
EggsAckley
(..........................all my pings are belong to ......YOU.....................)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson