It is well you use sarcastic allusions, because the infered argument is so wanting. You leave it to the reader to infer your two main premisis:
1) Arnold is getting a free pass among Conservatives.
2) That having teams of publically funded character assissins attack the reputation of Bill's victims is no worse then Arnold's supporters not accepting these allegations at face value.
Ofcoarse when spelled out your argument is absurd on the face of it. Seems that modern "liberalism" is best promoted by snotty sarcasm, being that logic and honesty just doesn't work with their positions.