Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Daily News: Rush Limbaugh in Pill Probe -- Talk radio star had drug habit, maid sez
NY Daily News & Drudge ^ | October 1, 2003 | Tracy Connor

Posted on 10/01/2003 10:41:34 PM PDT by lainie

Talk-radio titan Rush Limbaugh is being investigated for allegedly buying thousands of addictive painkillers from a black-market drug ring.

The moralizing motormouth was turned in by his former housekeeper - who says she was Limbaugh's pill supplier for four years.

Wilma Cline, 42, says Limbaugh was hooked on the potent prescription drugs OxyContin, Lorcet and hydrocodone - and went through detox twice.

"There were times when I worried," Cline told the National Enquirer, which broke the story in an edition being published today. "All these pills are enough to kill an elephant - never mind a man."

Cline could not be reached for further comment yesterday, but her lawyer, Ed Shohat of Miami, said his client "stands behind the story."

The Daily News independently confirmed that Limbaugh is under investigation.

His lawyers, Jerry Fox and Dan Zachary, refused to comment on the accusations and said any "medical information" about him was private and not newsworthy.

They said Limbaugh - who has a top-rated syndicated radio show but resigned early today from a weekly ESPN football segment amid criticism of racial comments about Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb - was traveling and had no comment.

The Palm Beach County state attorney's office, which is running the probe, said it could not confirm or deny the allegations.

Scoring in parking lot

Cline told the Enquirer she went to prosecutors with information about Limbaugh and others after four years of drug deals that included clandestine handoffs in a Denny's parking lot.

She said she wore a wire during her last two deliveries to the conservative commentator and gave the tapes to authorities.

She also gave the Enquirer a ledger documenting how many pills she claimed to have bought for him - 4,350 in one 47-day period - and E-mails she claimed Limbaugh sent her.

In one missive, Limbaugh pushed Cline to get more "little blues" - code for OxyContin, the powerful narcotic nicknamed hillbilly heroin, she said.

"You know how this stuff works ... the more you get used to, the more it takes," the May 2002 E-mail reads. "But I will try and cut down to help out."

The account Cline gave the Enquirer is that she became Limbaugh's drug connection in 1998, nine months after taking a housekeeping job at his Palm Beach mansion.

It started after her husband, David, hurt himself in a fall, and Limbaugh asked how he was.

"He asked me casually, 'Is he getting any pain medication?' I said, 'Yes - he's had surgery, and the doctor gave him hydro-codone 750,'" Cline said. "To my astonishment, he said, 'Can you spare a couple of them?'"

Husband's pills

Cline said she gave Limbaugh 10 pills the next day and agreed to give him 30 of her husband's pills each month. When the doctor stopped renewing the prescription in early 1999, Limbaugh allegedly went ballistic.

"His tone was nasty and bullying. He said, 'I don't care how or what you do, but you'd better - better! - get me some more,'" Cline said.

The housekeeper said she found a new supplier and arranged to hide Limbaugh's stashes under his mattress so his wife, Marta, wouldn't find them.

After several months, Limbaugh told her he was going to New York for detox and didn't need any more pills, Cline said.

But a month later, he said his left ear was hurting and asked her for hydrocodone, followed by an order for OxyContin.

Limbaugh, 52, suffered from autoimmune ear disease, a condition that left him deaf and had to be corrected with cochlear implant surgery two years ago.

Cline said she continued to make deliveries to Limbaugh even after she quit as his housekeeper in July 2001 - but he became increasingly paranoid, even patting her down for recording devices, she said.

In June 2002, Limbaugh told her he was going to New York for detox a second time.

After he returned, "I went to talk to him, and he cried a little bit," she said. "He told me that if it ever got out, he would be ruined."

She claimed that a lawyer for Limbaugh gave her a payoff - $80,000 he owed her, plus another $120,000 - and asked her to destroy the computer that contained the E-mail records.

Soon after, Cline and her husband retained Shohat and contacted prosecutors.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: addiction; afraidofrush; algorelostgetoverit; claslessdailynews; dailynewsnoclass; danzachary; edshohat; hitpiece; jerryfox; limbaugh; nationalenquirer; nydailynews; recovery; rush; rushlimbaugh; sleazydailynews; tabloidjournalism; talkradio; terrifiedofrush; wilmacline; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 821-835 next last
To: TheConservator
4. The "something" to this story, if there is a "something," could easily be that Rush for a short time, several years ago, while he was having his ear problems, did get hooked on some pain killer. In other words, something Rush won't be proud of, and makes him look bad, but is not a catastrophe.

His ear problem was only about two years ago, believe it or not (I know, a lot has happened since 2001, time sure flies lately). And this maid was hired in 1998?

I do NOT think there's a "something" to this story. There is too much that's not mentioned, such as how a brand-new maid went from skimming pills off her husband's scrip to procuring thousands of them on the black market. Why she'd still work as a maid with that kind of side income going. And why the payment of $180,00 would provoke her to call the police on the payor.

Many many blank spots here, but the maid's looking a lot worse than Rush ever could, IMO...

681 posted on 10/02/2003 2:48:49 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
What, he hadn't paid her in two-three years ? That's why he owed her $80,000 ?

That one bothered me too. Like Rush doesn't pay his help or something? I don't think so. So that right there tells me there is fly in this ointment.

682 posted on 10/02/2003 2:51:22 AM PDT by Samizdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: fire_eye
Let's assume Rush is a complete dope addict. Is he going to be getting pills from a #$%^&! *housekeeper*? and one that he barely knows?

That was the first hole I saw in this story. I'm sure with as much money and connections as Rush has, he'd have no problem getting in touch with Winona Ryder's doctor.

683 posted on 10/02/2003 2:54:13 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
"It's time the DNC smear machine is confronted and eliminated once and for all"

How? This is awful -- any idiot should be able to see that if Rush took 90 pills a day of anything, there's no way he could do what he does.

Carolyn

684 posted on 10/02/2003 3:02:04 AM PDT by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Soon after, Cline and her husband retained Shohat and contacted prosecutors.

..............because?????

Because the receipt of large amounts of money automatically makes one want to run to the police? Isn't that what anyone would do if somebody forced $180,000 into their hands?

Isn't it what you would do? Kill the golden goose? Run to the cops and voluntarily confess how you got paid off for an illegal activity?

My head hurts.

685 posted on 10/02/2003 3:03:19 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: tdadams; nopardons; Timesink; lainie; Pukin Dog; TrappedInLiberalHell; kayak; Richard Axtell; ...
Not sure all of these points have been made here:

Rush is a "public person" and under the "NY Times v. Sullivan" USSC decision would have to prove "actual malice" to win a slander/libel suit. That is a very high hurdle.

As noted here dealing drugs is much more serious than using prescription drugs without a prescription. If the allegation is true, then the prosecution would have to make a deal with a drug dealer to go after a drug user. Given the high-profile of the alleged user, if the prosecution did do that it may have a lot of explaining to do. The "middle man" is still a drug dealer. If, as has been assumed here, the prosecution was going after the middle man’s supplier and caught users in the net, then the prosecution will need to have netted the supplier also or it will look overly political.

The "star" witness being interviewed by the NE will not help the prosecutor. The witness has most likely sold her story for money or at least sought her 15 minutes of fame from it. If you are the "star" witness in a case like this, your comment to the media is "NO COMMENT". Her credibility is shot with regard to trial testimony.
686 posted on 10/02/2003 3:09:06 AM PDT by AndyMeyers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 683 | View Replies]

To: AndyMeyers
Methinks Rush is going to have the mother of all libel suits....
687 posted on 10/02/2003 3:25:33 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: AndyMeyers
Rush is a "public person" and under the "NY Times v. Sullivan" USSC decision would have to prove "actual malice" to win a slander/libel suit. That is a very high hurdle.

Quite a number of celebrities have successfully proved the same when scandal sheets are involved. The hurdle is high, but jumpable.

688 posted on 10/02/2003 3:32:22 AM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: Exigence
Especially since proving malice would be a no-brainer in this case.
689 posted on 10/02/2003 3:33:33 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
You may recall that right before 9-11, the usual suspects in the Jackal Pack Press were trying to paint oxycontin as the new Demon Drug-- there were stories of crazed codeine-heads driving maniacally all night through trailer parks to get their fix.

YES, and I also remember Rush devoting some time to the topic on one show. He didn't appear to know much about Oxycontin then at all! I recall that he seemed surprised when one caller, who had been on the drug for some time, said it didn't have a narcotic effect on her because of the degree of her pain.

I suppose Rush emailed his dealer right after that show and said "I must try some of that Oxycontin, my listeners are raving about it. Please provide appropriate code word for same!". /sarcasm

Seriously, if he was using black-market Oxycontin at that point in time, wouldn't you think he'd *avoid* that as a show topic? And avoid it like the fricking plague?

690 posted on 10/02/2003 3:34:11 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: lainie
WILMA CLINE? 42? Is she for real?

William Clinton X42

691 posted on 10/02/2003 3:53:02 AM PDT by arasina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MS.BEHAVIN
The recommended dose for adults is 10-30mg every 4 hours.

This maid is accusing him of taking what..100 pills a day?


The package insert for OxyContin (http://www.pharma.com/PI/Prescription/Oxycontin.pdf) shows that it is available in tablets from 10mg to 160mg (the 80mg & 160mg tablets are for opiod-tolerant patients only - which I would guess an addict has become opiod-tolerant). The Pharmaceutical Journal states "The maximum dose is 200mg 12-hourly for most patients. A few patients may require higher doses and doses in excess of 1,000mg have been reported." If Rush got 10mg tablets (I would guess on the black market you take whatever dosage you can get), 100 tablets would be 1000mg. That's more than the recommended maximum dose but less than what has been given safely.

I just read an article in the Annals of Emergency Medicine where a 45-year-old woman (I'm guessing her body weight was much less than Rush's) ingested 4000mg of OxyContin at one time in a suicide attempt and survived.

So, if Rush got low dosage pills, 100 a day would not be out of the realm of possibility, especially for an addict who might be "opiod-tolerant".
692 posted on 10/02/2003 3:56:24 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: arasina
Good catch - Wilma Cline 42=William Clinton, x42
693 posted on 10/02/2003 4:15:50 AM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I agree but how? They are already in high gear for campaign season. I saw this morning that the Davis campaign has let loose two women who say that Arnold groped them in the past. Today alone the RAT Networks will have The Arnold Groping, The Leak and Rush to smear all day long. Regardless if all three are true or not, they will repeat it ad nauseum all day long today to fill their air time. By the end of the day your neighbor will believe all three as truth. I heard some RAT consultant over the weekend say that "perception is the reality today". This is their game plan and we need to fight it every chance we get.
694 posted on 10/02/2003 4:16:35 AM PDT by capydick ("Our courage is all that stands between the enemies of civilization and of mankind.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: arasina
Wilma Cline's got an interesting lawyer...Click here for a little more on Ed Shohat.
695 posted on 10/02/2003 4:22:57 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies]

To: TrappedInLiberalHell
Bill Clinton had forcible an*l sex with dogs.
 
You and your lies.  It was consentual and you know it.

Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

696 posted on 10/02/2003 4:25:15 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (Sam Katz for Mayor 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Come on...no human could even get out of bed taking 97 of these type of pills a day.

I will be talking with a couple of nurses where I am assigned (teaching college). One already said that there is simply no way that the man could have snorted (addicts often grind up the pills and snort Oxycontin) the number of pills be attributed to Rush buying and/or taking - he would have died from complications brought on by an overdose.

697 posted on 10/02/2003 4:25:45 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
You and your lies. It was consentual and you know it.

It all depends on what the meaning of 'woof' is.

698 posted on 10/02/2003 4:26:34 AM PDT by TrappedInLiberalHell (Hillary walks into a bar. Let's hope it leaves a nice bump on her forehead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]

To: lainie
Prayers for Rush Yes!!!!! Hang in there Rush, America needs you, get well and put this behind you, we need people like you to tell our Side.,
699 posted on 10/02/2003 4:38:23 AM PDT by Eldorado431
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
So what! Look at Elvis and Ozzie, who cares. This may all work in Rush's favor with the MTV crowd. It may be better than Clinton playing the sexaphone.
700 posted on 10/02/2003 4:49:43 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (So where is Living History now? $1 by December?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 821-835 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson