To: milan
There are a lot of people on here that voted for Perot it seems to teach us all a lesson! As consort likes to call them -- Clinton conservatives!
They never paid attention when Texans were trying to tell them what a weasel Perot was and how he was hooked in with Clinton.
The "principled" people voted for Perot from a Party that had no social platform -- zero, zip, nada and who was pro-abortion! Now how do they square that with their attacks on Arnold?
257 posted on
09/26/2003 3:01:39 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
(Alpha Omnicron Pi Mom too! -- Visit http://www.georgewbush.com!)
To: PhiKapMom
There are two political things essential to the future of this country, including to the principles of conservatism:
1) the re-election of President Bush in 2004, and 2) the expansion of the Republican Senatorial majority (and knocking out key Democrats). To the extent that Conservatives contribute to those goals, not by votes but by activism, will they have the ear of those that will make things happen.
I'm an old Okie elsewhere situated, but I recall 15 years ago that besides God's, it was called Reagan's Country. Now look. Thank's for what you say and do, PKM! But is this a warmup to FR next spring, a battle with the Enablers?
To: PhiKapMom
What on earth gives you the idea that FReeper McClintock supporters voted for Perot? You could not be more wrong.
You will more likely find most of the former Perot and McCain supporters now attracted to Arnold.
280 posted on
09/26/2003 3:58:53 PM PDT by
djreece
(Conservative first, Republican second)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson