To: Burkeman1
A point I made on the previous posting of this article - what Ramsey is recommending is what we did in 1991, and it didn't work. The UN didn't step up to the plate, Iraq slid into chaos, and in retaking control Saddam gassed the Kurds. This policy is the reason we had to do it all over again.
To: Billthedrill
A point I made on the previous posting of this article - what Ramsey is recommending is what we did in 1991, and it didn't work. The UN didn't step up to the plate, Iraq slid into chaos, and in retaking control Saddam gassed the Kurds. This policy is the reason we had to do it all over again.
Note: Saddy gassed the Kurds in the 80s when he was our ally and we were still supplying him weapons to fight with the Iranis
65 posted on
09/26/2003 12:46:23 AM PDT by
Cronos
(W2004)
To: Billthedrill
A point I made on the previous posting of this article - what Ramsey is recommending is what we did in 1991, and it didn't work. The UN didn't step up to the plate, Iraq slid into chaos, and in retaking control Saddam gassed the Kurds. This policy is the reason we had to do it all over again.
Note: Saddy gassed the Kurds in the 80s when he was our ally and we were still supplying him weapons to fight with the Iranis
66 posted on
09/26/2003 12:46:27 AM PDT by
Cronos
(W2004)
To: Billthedrill
what Ramsey is recommending is what we did in 1991...Ahhh, but this time, Iraq would be left to fend for themselves. Just think, it would keep all of the muslim countries busy fighting for control of Iraq.
Besides it would just sdrive the demo's nuts. Not a friggin thing they could sau about it. Great strategy that would get the attention of UN, France and Germany.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson