Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: m1-lightning
I would have no objection to the phone lines not being used to transmit pornography, but that's hardly relevant to doing legitimate business over the phone

I think it's not the phone company's business that some subscribers pay for such service. I don't want it but it's a big business and provides a lot of jobs. The difference is, the phone customer is *purchasing* the service and not being solicited without permission.

So if the porn industry made 50 billion in telemarketing in your state, would you support it? Not to mention that telemarketing is not being banned.

I don't support *any* unsolicited telemarketing especially in the case of where I'm paying money to avoid it.

339 posted on 09/26/2003 10:52:13 AM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]


To: hotpotato
I agree
343 posted on 09/26/2003 11:07:31 AM PDT by m1-lightning (A charge to keep I have, a God to glorify, a never-dying soul to save, and fit it for the sky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

To: m1-lightning; Held_to_Ransom
m1, I just realized the first part of this was Ransom's comments and should have directed my post to that poster (reference my response #339).
344 posted on 09/26/2003 11:07:51 AM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson