Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California recall: Does one man hold key? [McClintock]
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 9-25 | Christian Science Monitor

Posted on 09/25/2003 2:54:50 PM PDT by ambrose

The Christian Science Monitor - csmonitor.com

from the September 26, 2003 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0926/p01s03-uspo.html

California recall: Does one man hold key?

Tom McClintock, top GOP conservative, could tilt race for or against Arnold Schwarzenegger.

By Daniel B. Wood | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

BURBANK, CALIF. - Republican candidate Tom McClintock laughs from deep in the belly when asked if he will be the "spoiler" in the great populist revolution/experiment/circus of California's gubernatorial recall election.

"My opponents say I'm the Ross Perot of this campaign, possibly siphoning off enough votes to hand the election to Democrats," he says, settling onto a shady park bench for an interview. "I say, 'Wait a minute.... Ross Perot was an idle millionaire, with no public-policy experience who one day on a whim entered the presidential race.' That sounds like another candidate in this race ... not me," he says, referring to muscleman/millionaire Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Once a mere asterisk in the con- fused calculus of California's 135-candidate recall election, Mr. McClintock has gradually emerged as the strong, third-place vote getter in polls - rising (at 14-to-18 points) while the two leaders - fellow Republican Schwarzenegger (26 points) and Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante (28 points) - tread water.

As the race enters its final stretch, McClintock's motives and acts are becoming paramount for two reasons. One, splitting the Republican vote, he could cost the party its best chance in a decade of high, statewide office. Two, his candidacy could drag down the success of the recall itself by forcing Republican partisans to reconsider driving Gov. Gray Davis from office because of fear that they could hand the office to a more liberal Democrat, Mr. Bustamante.

Ever since McClintock leaped from 4 percent voter support to double-digits about three weeks ago, the pressure has risen for him to stop offering himself as an alternative to Arnold Schwarzen-egger that could hand the election to Democrats. But as more voters get to know him, his poll numbers have continued to rise, while Schwarzenegger's are flat.

More conservative than Schwarzenegger on social issues - abortion, gay marriage, gun control - he is also far more experienced in fiscal matters, with California's sagging economy the No. 1 issue.

"He is by far the most studied and experienced of all the candidates in fiscal issues and how to implement public policy," says Jack Pitney, political scientist at Claremont McKenna College. "If the election were a college SAT test, McClintock would be the next governor hands down."

Even though he is widely acknowledged as the more knowledgeable, the more articulate, and the more detailed idea-man, 25-year government veteran McClintock does not have the millions of dollars of his chief Republican rival, nor his name recognition. Therein lies one of the chief ironies of the recall: Does he/should he/will he step aside to allow the neophyte challenger - and the Republican party - to gain its best chance of victory?

"He is a man who stands on his word and his principles while claiming time and again that he is in this to the last," says Doug Jeffe, a longtime California political consultant. "If he did get out, it would be totally uncharacteristic of him."

Now, with Schwarzenegger and Bustamante in a near dead heat, one leading Republican, Darrell Issa, the millionaire who bankrolled the signature gathering to oust Davis, has said that if Schwarzenegger or McClintock don't back off, Republicans should vote "no" on the recall. Polls show that if Arnold backed out, McClintock could not win.

But McClintock rejects a widespread analysis that conservative candidates have brought Republican fortunes to their low ebb. He feels the current crisis is the perfect storm for their historic comeback.

"Great parties are built on great principles," says McClintock, referring to the pillars of conservative policy: holding down taxes, cutting waste, standing up for the unborn, and resisting government approval of gay unions. "This is not a time to change our principles."

While such comments win kudos from some for adherence to principle, they strike others as bullheaded.

"McClintock's constant megaphoning of conservative social agendas is presenting a real problem for Republicans who really like him for his fiscal experience," says William Schneider, a pollster and political analyst. "They know Tom has the smarts to get this state out of economic problems and they worry about Arnold's lack of experience and specificity. But they don't think Tom can win and can't resist the fact that Arnold could."

As a child, McClintock campaigned for Barry Goldwater at age 8. In high school he organized classmates into a statewide GOP group. A political-science graduate of UCLA, he became a syndicated columnist railing about former Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, lauding the character of John Wayne. Hired by a former L.A. police chief-cum-state senator (Ed Davis), McClintock began a 25-year career in Sacramento, marked by opposition to Republican governors George Deukmejian and Pete Wilson over tax hikes and spending waste.

Despite his conservative stances, he was the top GOP vote-getter in the state, running for controller, in the 2002 election.

"I got very little from the state GOP and was outspent by my opponent by 5 to 1," says McClintock. "Despite all that, I lost by less than 1 percent of the vote."

A man who often quotes Reagan and Shakespeare, McClintock is considered a legislative loner with few legislative friends for his near two-decade pursuit of shrinking the state payroll.

In his favorite stump speech he tells why cutting is so important. As a child, he came home from school to find his mother crying over an unexpectedly high tax bill. The moment has lived in his imagination ever since that government takes too much from citizens and delivers too little.

Full HTML version of this story which may include photos, graphics, and related links


www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2003 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.
For permission to reprint/republish this article, please email copyright@csps.com



TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 501-517 next last
To: Tamsey
Jeb Bush quietly sent some of his best people to California to help on Arnold's campaign.

And don't think some of us won't remember that little factoid.

81 posted on 09/25/2003 3:56:33 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Call upon God to move on our behalf...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Yep.
82 posted on 09/25/2003 3:57:52 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Call upon God to move on our behalf...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Rodger Hedgecock just said the same thing when McC compared himself to Ronald Reagan. You could tell in Hedgecock's voice that he couldn't believe what he was hearing. I know I couldn't.

Have lived all over this Country and been around a number of Air Force bases so the communities I have lived in have been conservative and mostly Republican. In all those years of working in the trenches in Republican politics, I have never encountered an candidate that was so arrogant or condescending not to want to reach out to voters from all different groups when he was running for office. McC's approach of agreeing with a candidate 100% or not supporting that candidate is unbelieveable to me!

What I heard on the radio a short time ago makes McC too far right to get elected in Oklahoma. He is farther right than a far right candidate who happened to be Buchanan's campaign manager in 1988. That candidate lost in the Republican primary because he kept saying he was the "true" conservative in the race when the other candidate was also conservative and Oklahoma conservatives didn't like it either. That "true" conservative candidate lost the primary and then pouted with a lot of his supporters all the way through the general election, some stayed home, and almost cost J.C.'s seat to go to the DemocRATs.

83 posted on 09/25/2003 3:58:03 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Alpha Omnicron Pi Mom too! -- Visit http://www.georgewbush.com!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Don't equate President Bush to Arnold.

It is unfair to him, and damages him politically.
84 posted on 09/25/2003 3:59:19 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Call upon God to move on our behalf...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
'Wait a minute.... Ross Perot was an idle millionaire, with no public-policy experience who one day on a whim entered the presidential race.' That sounds like another candidate in this race ... not me," he says

What a jerk to say something like this. He actually sounds proud to be a career politician.

85 posted on 09/25/2003 4:01:04 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I'm voting for Arnold. McClintock doesn't deserve my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capitan_refugio
Thanks, pal.I do understand all that,btw, and his safe seat will mean diddly when a Republican gov named Arnie doles out perks and Tom's name won't be on the list of favoured few.He'll be roadkill sacrificed by his own vanity.

Your guy's such a dynamic presence that he can only carry his district and nothing else.Oh yeah, he's got the Big Mo!20+ yrs of Big Mo!
86 posted on 09/25/2003 4:02:08 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I heard Hedgecock's interview with Mclinader. It's clear Tom's in it for personal gain. He's been exposed time and again despite his claim that he's running on "principles". If he's successful in getting bustamante elected his career is over. I believe he knows that and that he'll drop out, sending all his TomBots crying to their rooms.
87 posted on 09/25/2003 4:02:18 PM PDT by South40 (Vote Mcclintock, elect bustamante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
I am getting VERY TIRED of hearing (reading) people call Arny a liberal or a RINO.

An ardent, died in the wool conservative, he is not; but, by the same token he is NOT a liberal. He is, admittedly, a bit left of center, but his views on many, many things is downright anathema to the left.

ANYONE who listened to the debate last night saw a member of the far left (Camejo), two liberals (Busty and the B***h), one non-liberal, non-rightist (Arny), and one ardent conservative (Tom Mc).

So, EVERYONE, stop with the BS about Arny being a liberal or a RINO. Vote for or against him, but at least BE FAIR!!
88 posted on 09/25/2003 4:02:28 PM PDT by fqued (Arma virumque cano)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Jesse Ventura was able to win in a shocker after consistently polling in third place.

LOL!! The last time I looked, it was a dim v pub v ind. Not one dim against two pubs splitting their votes!!

89 posted on 09/25/2003 4:02:35 PM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: fqued
Unfair? LOL...Arnold calls himself a liberal.
90 posted on 09/25/2003 4:03:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Call upon God to move on our behalf...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Fact >> McClintock AT THIS TIME IS UNELECTABLE in a statewide California election.

Fact >> McClintock's staying in the race will enhance Bustamante's chances significantly to become next gov.

Fact >> McClintock is 10 percentage points behind Arnold in average of ALL recent polls...refer to RealClearPolitics.com

Fact >> If McC stays in the race till the bitter end, his future in the GOP is el-finito, adios amigos.

Fact >> If McC bows out and endorses Arnold soon, his future in a national GOP venue will certainly be enhanced.

GO AHNOLD! Kaaliforneeya beckons you and needs you here and NOW.
91 posted on 09/25/2003 4:05:16 PM PDT by gwbiny2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: South40
"I heard Hedgecock's interview with Mclinader. It's clear Tom's in it for personal gain. He's been exposed time and again despite his claim that he's running on "principles". If he's successful in getting bustamante elected his career is over. I believe he knows that and that he'll drop out, sending all his TomBots crying to their rooms."

Knowing this, how can it be said that Tom is in it for personal gain when there is so much to lose. Personal gain goal would be to sit back and position himself as a candidate doing the deed for the party. It seems to me that through ACTION, he is proving that he is willing to take the risk of becoming a target...


92 posted on 09/25/2003 4:05:18 PM PDT by ProtectorOfTwo (......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
The Clintons are DESPERATE to keep California under DNC control and the GOP is struggling to make sure they don't. It would be awfully nice for Tom and supporters to take that into account themselves.

Clintons are desperate to have the recall fail. Tell me Tam, how many stops has the Rodham/Clinton team made for Bustamante? The recall is a bad precident against liberal tax and spend policies, but as for Bush in 2004, a Democrate in there is good for Bush, and they are far more aware of that then you have shown yourself to be. You asked me as a supporter to take what you said into account. I have, now study this map real hard.


93 posted on 09/25/2003 4:06:02 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (That's pre-election bogus, Arnold Schwarzenegger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: gwbiny2k
Fact >> If McC stays in the race till the bitter end, his future in the GOP is el-finito, adios amigos.

As opposed to the rousing show of support for McClintock in his previous race, as well as this one. Don't kid yourself - the CA GOP never has and never will support Tom. A hollow threat on your part.

94 posted on 09/25/2003 4:07:34 PM PDT by NittanyLion (Go Tom Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
you wrote :Unfair? LOL...Arnold calls himself a liberal.

When and where. Give us chapter and verse.

TODAY on the Sean Hannity show he called himself a "Moderate." We may not like that term, and it certainly is "Conservative," but Arny today called himself a "Moderate." There is Chapter and Verse against your statement, TODAY.

So, again, quit with calling Arny a Liberal and a RINO, EVERYONE, he is neither.
95 posted on 09/25/2003 4:08:36 PM PDT by fqued (Arma virumque cano)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: fqued
Hmm, lets see. Pro-Guncontrol, Pro-abortion, Pro-Gay benefits, Pro-Illegal-alien Amnesty, Pro-Socialism(for da kids) have I missed anything? Oh yes, he does have that one redeeming quality of saying he will not raise taxes(Not-Promising mind ya), just saying. Well shucks I guess you are right then he isn't a Liberal or a RINO, how does Liberal-RINO-Socalist sound?
96 posted on 09/25/2003 4:09:23 PM PDT by JustAnAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ProtectorOfTwo
Knowing this, how can it be said that Tom is in it for personal gain when there is so much to lose. Personal gain goal would be to sit back and position himself as a candidate doing the deed for the party. It seems to me that through ACTION, he is proving that he is willing to take the risk of becoming a target...

Are you serious? He's obviously not doing what's best for the party; he's doing what's best for Tom. He's actually deluded himself into thinking he can win. Reality says he can't.

97 posted on 09/25/2003 4:09:56 PM PDT by South40 (Vote Mcclintock, elect bustamante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: fqued
OOOPS! I meant:

It certainly ISN't conservative, but by the same token isn't liberal or RINO.
98 posted on 09/25/2003 4:10:30 PM PDT by fqued (Arma virumque cano)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: South40
"Are you serious? He's obviously not doing what's best for the party; he's doing what's best for Tom. He's actually deluded himself into thinking he can win. Reality says he can't."

Serious change always starts with serious people. Is the party doing what is best for the party, or what is best for the State of California?
99 posted on 09/25/2003 4:10:58 PM PDT by ProtectorOfTwo (......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I believe he will show the true greatness of his spirit --- and his deep understanding of the California scene --- by bowing out just in time.

I don't think that he should bow out at all. There are 130+ others that could bow out first. ;)

100 posted on 09/25/2003 4:12:40 PM PDT by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 501-517 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson