To: section9
I'm calling this debate for Arnold for beating expectations, and for Tom for substance. Well done for both guys.I essentially agree.
God-awful format, God-awful moderator, all made worse by Arianna, the fingernails on my blackboard of life. Notwithstanding that, I'd score it on content and presentation thusly:
Arnold: content 7, presentation 9, total 16
Tom: content 8, presentation 7, total 15
Cruse: content 3, presentation 5, total 8
Green Guy: content 2, presentation 4, total 6
Arianna: content 0, presentation 1, total 1
1,639 posted on
09/24/2003 7:14:53 PM PDT by
southernnorthcarolina
("Yes, but other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?")
To: southernnorthcarolina
I definitely rate Tom Mc. highest: Arnold was funny, but that's not appropriate here -- got caught up too much with AH, who should have been voted off within the first two minutes.
Boost was 3rd. Peter Green ranted into a fourth.
1,682 posted on
09/24/2003 7:17:41 PM PDT by
alancarp
(Saved by the Grace of God; In North Carolina likewise)
To: southernnorthcarolina
Excellent scoring, I would only add a category for entertainment factor ;0
To: southernnorthcarolina
Arnold: content 6, presentation 9, total 15
Tom: content 8, presentation 5, total 13
Cruse: content 2, presentation 2, total 4
Green Guy: content 0, presentation 1, total 1
Arianna: content 0, presentation -1, total -1
To: southernnorthcarolina
My input follows:
Green Guy: content 2, presentation 4, psychosis modifier -15, total -90 Arianna: content 0, presentation 1, annoyance factor -20, Perot clone -5, total -25
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson