Skip to comments.
*Poll says McClintock could win 1-0n-1 matchup*
National Review (The Corner) ^
| 9/22/03
| Peter Robinson
Posted on 09/24/2003 7:54:23 AM PDT by TheBigB
Brother Hugh, some news.
John Eastman, a professor of law at Chapman University and a frequent guest on your radio program, has just brought to my attention a poll that will interest you. Commissioned by the Lincoln Club of Orange County, the poll includes the following results:
If Arnold Schwarzenegger found himself in a head-to-head race against Cruz Bustamante--that is, in effect, if Tom McClintock dropped out of the race--then Schwarzenegger would win, 44 to 37 percent.
But if Tom McClintock found himself in a head-to-head race against Cruz Bustamante--that is, in effect, if Schwarzenegger dropped out of the race--then McClintock would win, 42 to 40 percent.
From the beginning, Hugh, you have made a single argument against McClintock, insisting that he cannot win.
But he can.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; cruz; mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 341-346 next last
To: JCEccles
The mantra among many here has consistently been "McClintock is unelectable." Now it's, "he's only within the margin of error so it's 50-50".
The Tom can't win is self fulfilling prophecy. It's the toilet paper shortage all over again.
To: TheBigB
Many of us knew this all along. Schwarzenegger should drop out. He's too liberal, and unqualified.
To: Dave S
I don't care what happens to California. You're going to get the governor you deserve, which is a scary thought, isn't it?
BTW, the only certainty in this election is that there is no certainty.
And you now have a strong track record of missing the point, so I'll assume that you'll miss the one in this post, too.
To: HamiltonJay
McClintock can't win this race, isn't going to win this race, and the only roll he can possibly play in this election is to cost the Republicans a victory. Correction: McClintock can't win this race, isn't going to win this race, and the only roll he can possibly play in this election is to cost Schwarzenegger and the Kennedys a victory.
To: JCEccles
You don't know that McClintock would be a disaster any more than you know that Schwarzenegger will be the second coming of Ronald Reagan Do you think the legislature is going to give McClinton even a NY minute? If an outsider like Arnold wins and wins big, they will have to give him some consideration. Someone who makes a living in front of a camera is goign to be more persuasive with the public than someone who cuts backroom deals.
205
posted on
09/24/2003 10:51:48 AM PDT
by
Dave S
To: Sabertooth
Didn't ya hear? Only left wingers can win, so we hafta vote for the action figure.
206
posted on
09/24/2003 10:52:51 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Dave S
Awww, somebody's feeling left out of the Recall fun in boring Missouri. Tough.
Makes me think you have a contrarian viewpoint and you couldnt survive without Davis or Bustamante to blame.
No, but that's going to be true for (R)nold if he gets elected. My viewpoint is called "Conservatism" maybe you've heard of them.
Again I ask, what has Tom ever accomplished besides saying no? Gotcha.
No, you are asking for the first time, also rather than attempting to play "gotcha" games, Out of State Know-It-All, perhaps in your superficial analysis of California history you might have picked up that the Car Tax has been illegally tripled (you know, the one that stoked alot of this Recall fun) was to undo a law Tom personally sponsored. Tom does that, its called "having a policy". Na, knowing that would be too easy for someone who knows anything and everything about the Peoples Republic of California, from flyover country. Maybe you can take a break from lecturing tonight at 8pm Central time to watch the debate, if its available in Missouri.
207
posted on
09/24/2003 10:53:20 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
((R)nold called me a "Right wing crazy" because I have a problem with his position on Prop 54)
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Look, can't you see that she has bested you in argument?
I suggest you retreat while you still have a chance, sir.
onyx: "I'm not calling you a name. I'm calling you a name"
208
posted on
09/24/2003 10:54:17 AM PDT
by
SteveH
((Californians for, like, you know, Moon Unit!!!))
To: NYC Republican
I see you've posted again, yet ran away from all the points I made. I think you definitely count as #1!
209
posted on
09/24/2003 10:54:19 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
((R)nold called me a "Right wing crazy" because I have a problem with his position on Prop 54)
To: PhiKapMom
On Aug. 28, 2004 the CA Senate passed the "Domestic Partners' Legislation...... Where was McClintock? He didn't vote on it either up or down...... Maybe some of the Conservatives are upset with him about that, who knows....
210
posted on
09/24/2003 10:54:37 AM PDT
by
deport
To: B Knotts
Schwarzenegger should drop out. His stage managers won't allow that.
211
posted on
09/24/2003 10:54:44 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: TheBigB
The Arnold groupies made such a FATAL ERROR RIGHT FROM THE GET GO by spitting in the face of conservatives. They could have had it all. But there's not a conservative bone in their collective bodies. NO REPUBLICAN CAN WIN IN CA WITHOUT THE CONSERVATIVE BASE. Go, McClintock! www.helptom.com
212
posted on
09/24/2003 10:54:58 AM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(R.I.P. Holly Patterson who was killed by RU486 administered by Planned Parenthood)
To: Dave S
I cant tell you what you are or they will ban me.Please do.
213
posted on
09/24/2003 10:55:23 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
((R)nold called me a "Right wing crazy" because I have a problem with his position on Prop 54)
To: tallhappy
Now [the mantra is], "he's only within the margin of error so it's 50-50".
But, again: the poll result to which you're referring derives from a hypothetical situation that is, at best, unlikely to be presented to voters.
It clearly shows that, had neither Arnold nor other major GOP candidates run (and stayed in the race), McClintock could win a squeaker over Bustamante.
So my point is, the poll doesn't show Tom IS within the margin of error, etc., but rather that he COULD HAVE BEEN. "Could have been" isn't "is," with apologies to Billy Jeff.
214
posted on
09/24/2003 10:55:53 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: tallhappy
They are beyond rational debate. Their support of Schwarzenegger is glandular. That irrational support is likely to carry over to his performance in office, which means he will have license to do things they would recall a Democrat governor for doing.
And they wonder how they got into the mess they are in.
To: tallhappy
They do their own polling, not for public release. They want accurate objective polling data.
Do you know when this was taken? Was it recent or was it sometime back when they made their endorsement? Any Ideas?
216
posted on
09/24/2003 10:56:14 AM PDT
by
deport
To: pogo101
All electability-predicting polls are hypothetical, including the polls showing Schwarzenegger in the lead.
To: deport
Well don't tell me the CA Conservatives are shallow in their supporthmmm.
If they were so strong in support of and believed in McClintock it wouldn't matter what anyone said or who the other candidate was.
Well, that sums it up for me, the rest of you people just aren't that bright.
218
posted on
09/24/2003 10:58:04 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
((R)nold called me a "Right wing crazy" because I have a problem with his position on Prop 54)
To: SteveH
"Gray Davis has just started talking about the environment the last few days," Schwarzenegger said. But he backtracked when reminded of recent legislation signed by the governor, saying, "I'm not aware of all those bills that he has signed the last year." Arnold wants to be the far left environmental whacko in this race.
219
posted on
09/24/2003 10:59:32 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Saundra Duffy
NO REPUBLICAN CAN WIN IN CA WITHOUT THE CONSERVATIVE BASE.
Again I ask you why doesn't the CA Conservative base support McClintock with more than 30% of their vote? What do they know about him that keeps their support down below their support for Schwarzenegger? They are supporting Schwarzenegger greater than McClintock so maybe that is why Schwarzenegger is leading, huh?
220
posted on
09/24/2003 11:00:20 AM PDT
by
deport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 341-346 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson