Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeTheHostages
"Protecting our nation's leaders from dissent is unconstitutional."

Does the constitution speak of how close people need to come in order for their speech to be free? Or does the constitution really indicate that you can say what you want -- but silent on forcing folks to listen?

If the constitution says people have to listen to what you want to say, then I'd like time on NBC, CBS and ABC to tell people want a left-wing organization the ACLU has become.

6 posted on 09/24/2003 7:54:52 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (France delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
Good idea. Give the ACLU a call and press this with them. We would love to read their reaction. ;-)
14 posted on 09/24/2003 8:17:12 AM PDT by moodyskeptic (weekend warrior in the culture war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
If the constitution says people have to listen to what you want to say, then I'd like time on NBC, CBS and ABC to tell people want a left-wing organization the ACLU has become.

Well put. But alas, as I clearly realize you know, you don't have a First Amendment right to do that -- or to meet with the President and tell him what you think of him.
20 posted on 09/24/2003 8:25:32 AM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
If I was a terrorist, I would hold up a pro Bush sign. The ACLU bloodsuckers are right on this one.

They allow people cheering Bush closer access, but if you are a protest group, ya get hidden to the side. It is not about security, but photo ops basically.

The Secret Service can remove all people, or neither group. Like I said, a terrorist would hang out with the Pro President group since they get to be closer to the Prez.

There should be a determination of how close any group can be due to security, and have it apply to everybody. People's right to dissent should not be suppressed just because the message is unpopular.

24 posted on 09/24/2003 8:31:41 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy; FreeTheHostages
They have the right to protest.
They don't have the right to media coverage.
They don't have a "right" to be paid attention to.
37 posted on 09/24/2003 9:11:27 AM PDT by visualops (Two Wrongs don't make a right - but they will be on the Democratic Ticket in 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
I cannot believe this! When I ... for reasons too numerous for this thread... saw Clinton when he was in Philly, I was close enough to hear him tell the secret service to get rid of the protestors in the back. In 5 minutes, they were GONE. Not only did he keep them at a distance, but he kept them out of the area.

And now... grrrrrrrrrr, gritting my teeth.
110 posted on 09/24/2003 1:00:35 PM PDT by myrabach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson