Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Now before you judge Norwood too much, let me say that I live there and I think they did what was best for the city.
1 posted on 09/24/2003 6:17:31 AM PDT by areeves79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: areeves79
I was going to say something about violating property rights, but obviously if you feel it's for the best, that trumps any petty rights other people may have.
2 posted on 09/24/2003 6:20:33 AM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
What does Dingell have to say about all this?
3 posted on 09/24/2003 6:22:34 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
Only by the WCPO can we tell this is east of the Mississippi, and your profile that it's in Ohio. Thanks for the great info.

So you beleive it's OK for a city government to take peoples homes for developement by a private entity?
4 posted on 09/24/2003 6:27:18 AM PDT by ctlpdad (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
Cat got your tongue? I would love to see your reasons why businesses can take property at will, with your blessings.
5 posted on 09/24/2003 6:32:49 AM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
Doesn't matter what you think. What matters is that these peoples private property rights are being infringed.
6 posted on 09/24/2003 6:35:32 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
I think they did what was best for the city.

Hitler did what he thought was best for the world. I'll bet Stalin did what he thought was best for Russia, and Fidel thought he did what was best for Cuba..........

7 posted on 09/24/2003 6:48:11 AM PDT by TonyWojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
Now before you judge Norwood too much, let me say that I live there and I think they did what was best for the city.

If I took all your money it would be the best for me.

If I took all Bill Gates money and gave it to Norwood it would be the best for the city.

12 posted on 09/24/2003 7:03:00 AM PDT by Protagoras (The only thing worse than drugs is the War on Drugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
Ahhh...Norwood and Cincinnati. Brings back many fond memories of my old home town.

I used to live over in Brentwood. We spent many a beautiful Summer day in Winton Woods up in the Forest Park area. Playing baseball, swimming and washing down the grilled brats with a bottle of Vernor's Ginger Ale. Those were the days.

13 posted on 09/24/2003 7:03:43 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
I have been over in that area and it is not that damn bad compared to other areas of that city. Norwood is still smarting from not being able to name the area after themselves because of nearby Hyde Park.

I am so glad I moved!!
18 posted on 09/24/2003 7:28:47 AM PDT by Baby Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
I have friends who live in Norwood. My college roommate was from Norwood. Hope it all works for the best.
19 posted on 09/24/2003 7:30:46 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
"What about Dingel-Norwood?" - Al Gore
24 posted on 09/24/2003 7:52:44 AM PDT by superfluousdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
Why sho' we hung that nigra, but it wuz best fo' the community.
25 posted on 09/24/2003 7:53:24 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
I'm afraid that your are on the wrong side with this issue.
Either that or you are on the wrong forum.

Private property rights should top the wants of a corporation running to the city because someone wouldn't sell EVERY time.

If the corporation wants the property let them pay what the property owners wants as a price. If the property owner wants too much, build around them and leave them a right of way that is also the truck route to get to the newly built part.
Running to the city/county/state for eminent domain to get what the corporation wants is wrong!
Eminent domain needs to return to what it was originally meant for.

27 posted on 09/24/2003 8:01:28 AM PDT by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
When new visitors drive into our town, they will see a Wal Mart on the right along with multiple large businesses and large office buildings. To the left, they will see a large working dairy farm of many acres. They are always amazed to see a farm in the midst of commercial property.

This farmer's land is valued in square feet instead of acres, because of the prime location.

He does not want to sell. I would hate to think what the people of this town would do to our city government who tried such a trick to take his land.
28 posted on 09/24/2003 8:17:16 AM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areeves79
Please check out http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/988594/posts for another story on this subject
29 posted on 09/24/2003 10:11:38 AM PDT by ctlpdad (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson