Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
The Complaint does not seem to be very well drafted. He is claiming that the restrictions are a group boycott (i.e., an illegal conspiracy among competitors), but only the NFL is named as a defendant -- if he is alleging a conspiracy, I would have thought he'd name each NFL club as a defendant too. In the end, though, I guess this will turn on whether the collective bargaining exemption is found to apply.
175 posted on 09/23/2003 1:01:22 PM PDT by triplejake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: triplejake
The CBA is between the NFLPA and the NFL, not each team.
176 posted on 09/23/2003 1:04:54 PM PDT by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: triplejake
At the least it should have been the NFL and NFLPA. The worse his complaint is drafter the better as far as I'm concerned. Teenagers are bad for professional sports. And as a former manager who's planning on managing again I fear court rulings that limit an employer's ability to screen his employees as he sees fit.
181 posted on 09/23/2003 1:09:18 PM PDT by discostu (just a tuna sandwich from another catering service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson