Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bikers4Bush
I imagine this is an antitrust case, not age discrimination -- individual employers might be able to set minimum age standards, but competiting employers can't jointly agree not to compete in hiring certain employees.
17 posted on 09/23/2003 11:27:35 AM PDT by triplejake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: triplejake
That's the problem. They are not competing employers they are all one entity. There is a certain amount of revenue sharing that goes on which ties them to one another more than it divides them.

24 posted on 09/23/2003 11:29:22 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: triplejake
From an employment perspective NFL teams are not competing employers. They are franchises, just like different McDonalds stores, they are functionally ONE employer with numerous sites but a common set of rules.
32 posted on 09/23/2003 11:32:14 AM PDT by discostu (just a tuna sandwich from another catering service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: triplejake
Are they individual employers if they only have a franchise. If they aren't then it seems to me that they are obligated to follow the NFL rules.
147 posted on 09/23/2003 12:39:30 PM PDT by AgentEcho (If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: triplejake
I don't see the teams of the NFL as competing employers. They are more like competing supervisors. The employer is the NFL.
230 posted on 09/23/2003 6:40:17 PM PDT by daveoverpar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson