Skip to comments.
President Bush Addresses the United Nations and Calls on World to Unite Against Terror, Sep 23, 2003
Bush-Cheney '04 ^
| Sep 23, 2003
| President George W. Bush
Posted on 09/23/2003 9:02:28 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-129 next last
To: Peach
The RATS are gasping their last dying breaths. Kennedy was livid, going on that the people of America are confused about why we went to war in Iraq.
In truth it's Kennedy who has a PhD in Confusion.
Prairie
61
posted on
09/23/2003 10:02:40 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(I have dozens of great taglines in my attic. I just can't climb up to get them.)
To: Peach
I'll tell you what made my blood boil....A caller to Laura Ingraham's show yesterday talking about Wesley Clark's "moral superiority" to President Bush. How can a group of people who claim there is no such thing as "morals" claim that any of their ilk is "morally superior" to anyone?
62
posted on
09/23/2003 10:03:09 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: prairiebreeze
LOL!
Kennedy has completely twisted the president's words and is beneath contempt.
63
posted on
09/23/2003 10:03:17 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: boscooo
Short attention span huh? Or did you forget your meds today?
Prairie
64
posted on
09/23/2003 10:03:29 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(I have dozens of great taglines in my attic. I just can't climb up to get them.)
To: prairiebreeze
This is all frustrating, but I can't help but get the impression that Carl Rove has the Democrats right where he wants them.
65
posted on
09/23/2003 10:04:11 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
Comment #66 Removed by Moderator
To: My2Cents
Hope Laura asked if it was morally superior to kill thousands of innocent civilians fighting an unnecessary war. And how about those hundreds of thousands of people supposedly being murdered through ethnic cleansing campaigns when the UN only found a few thousand?
Clark wasin charge of that campaign and it wasn't morally superior to even, say, Arafat.
67
posted on
09/23/2003 10:04:49 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: boscooo
Someone ZOT this fool!
68
posted on
09/23/2003 10:05:47 AM PDT
by
Hazzardgate
(RIP Paul Kersey)
To: PhiKapMom
Bill Nelson on Fox:
"No olive branch"........Jeff Sessions countering.
To: Hazzardgate
Heads must be exploding over at DummyU. Lots of troll stench around today. Poor babies, they just can't relate to the fact that America now has a real man for President. Makes them twitch and drool.
Prairie
70
posted on
09/23/2003 10:06:06 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(I have dozens of great taglines in my attic. I just can't climb up to get them.)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
To: Abynormal
HOW MANY SPEECHES HAS THE SENATOR GIVEN DEMANDING AN ACCOUNTING OF THE MILLIONS THAT DISAPPEARED INTO THE BIG DIG
72
posted on
09/23/2003 10:08:17 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: prairiebreeze
Indeed! DUmmys are so boring and predictable these days.
73
posted on
09/23/2003 10:08:41 AM PDT
by
Hazzardgate
(RIP Paul Kersey)
To: PhiKapMom
Thanks for posting the transcript....it was on right after I got out of my US govt. Class. I was going to go to the lounge and watch it but realized I had to make up a test for my religions of the world class.
Sounds like he came off strong and determined..still hoping to catch some soundbites later on.
74
posted on
09/23/2003 10:09:07 AM PDT
by
Blue Scourge
("If a man hasn't found something he is willing to die for he is not fit to live"- M. Luther King Jr.)
To: PhiKapMom
In my mind President Bush is much too nice.
If I had been giving that speech, it would have gone something like this.
Many of you in this chamber know that there is a significant amount of oil wealth in Iraq. I believe this fact is clear. What I think is not clear is that we are the ones who are currently sitting on it and you are not. Some of you seem to think it's the other way around. I'm here to remind you it isn't.
Up to this point America, with a few allies, notably Great Britain, have done the hard work, spent the money, and shed the blood to liberate Iraq from its brutal dictator. The rest of you have stood by and watched, criticizing from the sidelines like some fans at an NFL game.
After we have done all that work you have the unmitigated gall to suggest that we should simply hand it all over to you so you can make the money from Iraqi oil, the way you did with your bogus "Oil for Food" program and your illegal embargo busting. That kind of chutzpa might have worked with other administrations, but it won't work with this one.
If you think you can take this oil from us, then bring it on. Otherwise, I suggest you get off your high-horses and start showing some respect. If you ask politely we may, and I emphasize may, let you in on the reconstruction. If you don't, then we're going to continue to do this without you, and you won't get one thin American dime of that Iraqi oil money.
Thank you, and don't take too long making up your minds.
I suppose it's a good thing I'm not President.
Shalom.
75
posted on
09/23/2003 10:11:15 AM PDT
by
ArGee
(Hey, how did I get in this handcart? And why is it so hot?)
To: Peach
Kennedy doesn't note a difference between us developing nukes and North Korea. Shows you what he thinks about America.
76
posted on
09/23/2003 10:18:43 AM PDT
by
votelife
(Free Bill Pryor)
To: PhiKapMom
Thanks for posting; I was stuck in a meeting and missed it. You're right, no groveling whatsoever, a powerful restatement of why we did what we did and why we were right to do so, and a thumb of the nose at the French and others who are trying to undermine Iraqi reconstruction. You can bet that the direct reference to the Marshall Plan, which saved Europe from starvation, depression, and Marxism, was aimed right at the French and the Germans.
To: PhiKapMom; Miss Marple
I look at the "timing" of drunken Kennedy's vitriolic attacks on POTUS. I think he's hoping to turn voters in my state against Arnold.
78
posted on
09/23/2003 10:23:58 AM PDT
by
onyx
To: PhiKapMom
Kennedy wants his fellow liberals in the press to play his soundbits after Bush's tonite on the evening news.
And he will get it.
To: Peach
It's also hard to call someone like Clark "morally superior" when 1) he doesn't know what his own opinions are, 2) associates with the left who don't believe in morals, and 3) is the hand puppet of the Clintons, who get their morals from the pit of Hell.
80
posted on
09/23/2003 10:35:39 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson