|
Curb--Our--Courts!
Curb--Our--Courts!
Curb--Our--Courts!
Congress will not get cooking until they feel the heat -- and that heat must come from us!
That being said, the guidance of Bush v Gore that you cannot have voters subjected to differing standards has been unevenly applied by lower courts, to say the very least. Furthermore, many states still have disparate voting systems statewide, and so that's an additional caveat.
It's really up in the air what the SCOTUS might do. It's conceivable that the SCOTUS will take the case and extend the stay indefinitely, even if it rules after Oct 7 [thus allowing this recall to proceed]. It's also conceivable that the Supreme Court will not extend the stay, even if they do take up the case [thus postponing the recall to March].
If I had to guess, they will decline review, but that's a very low confidence conjecture. The case law pursuant Bush v Gore is simply to novel and undeveloped to guess with any great deal of certainty..