Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carlo3b
I wish I had more tolerance for the Civil War. I really do not. I think it was a horrible thing that those men died ,and for the reasons as I understand them.

I pay homage to those soilders, because I think they were doing their patriotic duty as they understood it. That is what a hero does.

Any way I look at it, I just believe it was a dark period in our country's history. Perhaps I do not understand the finer points. That really could be.

6 posted on 09/15/2003 8:22:29 AM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross ((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: No More Gore Anymore
I wish I had more tolerance for the Civil War. I really do not.

Through the dust peers Lee for hope. To the east a column raises dust. To a subaltern with younger eye, he asks, "who comes there?" The young officer replies, "they are Yankees, General." Turning in the saddle to the south, Lee asks again, who comes there? And the reply, "they are Confederates, general." "Thank God" says Lee, "its A.P. Hill come from Harpers Ferry."

And so my grandfather survived until Appomatox and bequethed to you a cauldron of liberty.

16 posted on 09/15/2003 9:01:49 AM PDT by nathanbedford (qqua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: No More Gore Anymore
I pay homage to those soilders, because I think they were doing their patriotic duty as they understood it. That is what a hero does.

Any way I look at it, I just believe it was a dark period in our country's history. Perhaps I do not understand the finer points. That really could be

You are precisely correct in your conclusions and concern. Both are true feelings that should come forth in viewing the uncivil struggle of a just war in the view of at least half of our nation at the time.

Whether, your sympathies lay with the Rebels (the Southern cause), in that "We have fought a war for independence from a tyrannical central form of governance, then why should we again trade 1 tyrant a thousand miles away, for a hundred tyrants 10 miles away" Each of the Southern States had within it's state Constitution, an escape clause.. A secession clause, in the event that state felt that they could no longer agree with federal authority.. The U S Constitution ratified those states knowing those clauses were a part and parcel. So, when each state found that the northern states were imposing their will on the authority of the southern states with singular stinging tariffs and levees directed at just the commerce of the south.. they bolted from the Union, with a legal vote of their people. Slave trade was a particular unsavory aspect of primarily the Southern states it did exist widely in the north as well.. but it was not the primary, or secondary cause of the split.

The Federalists (Northern States), with an advantage of population, and therefore the legal voting power in the federal legislature (congress), believed in the strength of numbers, and the entire Union was integrated as one unit. This meaning the laws, military defense, common heritage, and commerce where tied into each and every part as it was intended. When the Southern state became obstinate, and rebelled.. the power of the United States Government as it was, moved forcibly to hold it together.

The cause was inexorably, in the EYE OF THE BEHOLDER!

17 posted on 09/15/2003 9:14:05 AM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson