To: softengine
Kids have been getting sex ed without their parent's permission since the beginning of time.
2 posted on
09/11/2003 11:44:50 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: softengine
Tuition for my first grader, third grader, and sixth grader at a good Lutheran School: $530/month.
The occasional family discussions about the differences between the Lutheran faith and our own: free.
The knowledge that my children are prayed with and for, and that their teachers aren't going to play mind games on them: Priceless!
Why are all these people keeping their kids in public school? So they can drive a new car?! So they can eat out more often?! Might as well put your baby on the liberal altar before birth and let them sacrifice it then. Why have kids if you aren't going to be THE person in control of how the child is raised and educated?
3 posted on
09/11/2003 11:46:25 AM PDT by
ChemistCat
(Focused, Relentless Charity Beats Random Acts of Kindness.)
To: mhking
I'm 'Just damn.' -ing all over the place today.
4 posted on
09/11/2003 11:47:02 AM PDT by
softengine
(Burglars - the preferred chew treat of 200lb Saint Bernards.)
To: softengine
The most dangerous place for kids to be in are CA government schools.
8 posted on
09/11/2003 11:51:49 AM PDT by
Kuksool
To: softengine
Not to worry Ah-nold will teach Gay rights -ED.
To: softengine
Separation of School and State BUMP!
14 posted on
09/11/2003 12:31:38 PM PDT by
TheDon
(Tick, tock, tick, tock...the sound of the clock ticking down the time until Tom drops out.)
To: softengine
Separation of School and State BUMP!
15 posted on
09/11/2003 12:31:39 PM PDT by
TheDon
(Tick, tock, tick, tock...the sound of the clock ticking down the time until Tom drops out.)
To: softengine
I got $10 says the Log Cabin Republics support this kind of rot.
16 posted on
09/11/2003 12:33:18 PM PDT by
FormerLib
(There's no hope on the left!)
To: softengine
A family member who opposes our homeschooling once accused me of being obsessed with homosexuality because it's always one of the first reasons I mention for not putting our sons in government schools. With survey questions like those in the article, it's obvious exactly who is obsessed with it, and why, even if the obsessed one was me, there'd certainly be good reason.
17 posted on
09/11/2003 12:38:55 PM PDT by
FourPeas
(USA! USA! USA!)
To: softengine
Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Los Angeles, the bill's sponsor, argues its purpose is to streamline a process that now is a confusing patchwork of ''opt-in'' or ''opt-out'' requirements depending on whether the class is about sexually transmitted diseases, HIV education, sex education or surveys related to sexual behavior, the San Jose Mercury News reported. As I have observed with respect to NPR:
Individual choice liberals object to results in a "patchwork quilt" of outcomes.
Lack of individual choice liberals desire results in a "one size fits all" outcome.
(steely)
To: softengine
Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Los Angeles, the bill's sponsor, argues its purpose is to streamline a process that now is a confusing patchwork of ''opt-in'' or ''opt-out'' requirements depending on whether the class is about sexually transmitted diseases, HIV education, sex education or surveys related to sexual behavior, the San Jose Mercury News reported. As I have observed with respect to NPR:
Individual choice liberals object to results in a "patchwork quilt" of outcomes.
Lack of individual choice liberals desire results in a "one size fits all" outcome.
(steely)
To: softengine
If your kids are in public school, they are getting plenty of sex ed that you don't know about and it had nothing to do with the teachers.
23 posted on
09/11/2003 12:49:22 PM PDT by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrisssssssstian)
To: scripter
Ping
24 posted on
09/14/2003 7:05:01 PM PDT by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson