Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California GOP Insiders: McClintock Will Drop Out
newsmax.com ^ | 09.09.03 | Eric Leonard, NewsMax.com

Posted on 09/10/2003 1:10:18 PM PDT by VU4G10

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-283 next last
To: Tempest
I'm sorry, did you say something to me?


161 posted on 09/10/2003 2:06:41 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Arnold is the Bloomberg of California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

Comment #162 Removed by Moderator

To: EternalVigilance
This new technology works great!
163 posted on 09/10/2003 2:07:26 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Arnold is the Bloomberg of California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: ysoitanly
Bust-a-move is term-limited out in 04, I believe. Just in time for McClintock to serve during Arnold's second (And first full) term.

And then onto the Govenorship with him. With a REAL chance to win. Not this beyond his WILDEST dream he's been having the last few weeks.
164 posted on 09/10/2003 2:08:55 PM PDT by A Broken Glass Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Yes, I understand that. Do you understand that it's a two-edged sword? My point is not that voters won't have the opportunity to vote for McClintock regardless of what happens at this point; it's that the Republican leadership will have put all their eggs (the ones destined for their faces under this scenario) into Arnold's basket instead of helping the true conservative take his best shot.
165 posted on 09/10/2003 2:08:58 PM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: A Broken Glass Republican
Whoops...Make that 06, not 04.
166 posted on 09/10/2003 2:09:27 PM PDT by A Broken Glass Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Fzob
The more he says he will not drop out, the more pressure on the AS camp. The deals will come to a head this weekend. Lets hope the decisions made are good for the State, and all here concerned.
167 posted on 09/10/2003 2:09:33 PM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Well it maybe about the fact that McClintock doesn't look like he's doing that well among Republican voters based upon internals from the following three polls .......

 
Republican Voters     Schwarzenegger    McClintock

CA Field Poll               43%              28%
USA Survey Poll             56%              25%
CA C of C Poll              44%              23%

168 posted on 09/10/2003 2:10:03 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Duramaximus
guess RINO fits this-sort of like some so-called CHRISTIANS who don't believe in the CHRIST'S VIRGINAL BIRTH,RESURRECTION,or that HE IS GOD
169 posted on 09/10/2003 2:10:04 PM PDT by y2k_free_radical (ESSE QUAM VIDERA-to be rather than to seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
Have they accused him of smoking, yet?

Seriously, though, his alleged use of the "n" word in competition hasn't been fully exploited yet. Granted, it amounts to horrendous hypocrisy for them to use that as an attack given Bustamante's more recent use of it; however, inconsistency and hypocrisy have never tended to bother libs much. One problem is that they haven't yet had the opportunity to hurl those accusations at him in the context of a widely-watched debate. By the time the one takes place that Arnold has agreed to, he's left himself virtually no time to rehabilitate himself from that; and you can bet that would be the first time a lot of voters (the Entertainment Tonight bloc) would find out about those tidbits.

170 posted on 09/10/2003 2:12:24 PM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: notorious vrc
I'm not sure what's driving Drudge on this, but the 26 year old stories left me flat. I may not like some of the things Arnold stands for, but I like "NOTHING AT ALL" that Bustamante stands for.

Bustamante is racist separatist. Tell me what trumps that? I haven't seen it yet and I doubt I will. It would have to be something like treason or murder.
171 posted on 09/10/2003 2:12:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Don't want you getting your mouse all dirty. heh

That only happens when I look for pictures of Jaime Pressly or Niki Taylor.

But perhaps I've shared too much...

172 posted on 09/10/2003 2:13:14 PM PDT by TheBigB (I don't believe in Astrology. We Scorpios are skeptical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Yeah, about the same amount of support they've given to other conservative republicans over the past ten years.

And Arnold supporters will be every bit as eager to support him then as they are now.

Psst. They don't LIKE conservatives.

Get out the Justin Timberlake a listen to "Cry Me a River"

Feel better? No? I bet you every Republican in the state that voted, voted for McClintock last election, and he still lost. That's one thing about McClintock supporters, there not very good at math. Suuure.. It's cause no other Republican's vote for him.. Riiiight.

173 posted on 09/10/2003 2:13:20 PM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #174 Removed by Moderator

To: kidd
I don't get this whole no new taxes pledge crap?! What do you think that a "pledge" is actually going to do.

Bob Riley, Governor of Alabama gave a pledge and look what's happening to him.

I think a pledge is nothing but hot air. You need to look at the persons overall outlook and views on taxes. Arnold has the right outlook and views and that is, is that Californians are being gouged by the state on taxes and that he intends to make sure that the unconstitutional taxe increases that have been instated are repealed and that no new taxes are levied that will hinder economic growth in California. Which is the main goal of his campaign.

Arnold knows that increased taxes do not attract bussinesses nor does it inspire growth. I respect his honest position that barring an emergency (e.g. major natural disaster or terrorist attack) that he will not institute a tax increase.

It's that simple and straight forward think that I support in Arnold. Not some worthless "Tax-pledge". Pfft!
175 posted on 09/10/2003 2:15:01 PM PDT by Tempest (I've lost all hope for half of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Can you say mega bucks, mega appearances by Pres Bush and Arnold along with more Administration/Senators/RNC folks than you can count would be out campaigning for McClintock!

Look around here on FR. How much is the conservative getting here? He'll get the same against Boxer. When a more "attractive" candidate "who can win" comes along, people will abandon their principles. He'll get squat. Disgusting.

176 posted on 09/10/2003 2:16:54 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: A Broken Glass Republican
Yes, but he still serves until 2004 no matter who is elected governor, unless it's him. Then the new governor appoints a successor, I believe. Correct me if I'm wrong, please!
177 posted on 09/10/2003 2:17:31 PM PDT by ysoitanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Tempest; kidd
Bob Riley made the pledge, Jeb Bush didn't.

Guess which one HASN'T raised taxes?
178 posted on 09/10/2003 2:17:40 PM PDT by EllaMinnow (Never Forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: A Broken Glass Republican
Thanks - you had my head spinning and I ended up agreeing with the wrong year, too. Our posts nullify each other! ;)
179 posted on 09/10/2003 2:19:05 PM PDT by ysoitanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
I called the head of the San Diego GOP and asked him why I should give them money and my time if they don't have the guts to back up one candidate. He told me it was against the law to back a candidate...huh?
180 posted on 09/10/2003 2:21:24 PM PDT by Hildy (SUCKER: Short-sighted Uncompromising Conservative Kool-Aid-drinking Elitist Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson