[Peach]

I've had some of the same thoughts, but it seems increasingly silly to disavow the fact that Iraq was behind the attacks given the political situation in the country.

Since we have gone to war in Iraq, what better way to galvonize public opinion and support, than to provide all the information about Iraq. It just doesn't make sense to hold back, IMO.

I'm so convinced Iraq was behind the attacks, both 9/11 and the first WTC bombing, that it frustrates me to no end that we don't use the information we have.

The democrats would never hold public office again on a national leadership level, if we told people what we know, and also told people that the congressional leadership knew too as a result of their intelligence briefings.

[Valin]

I agree they were involved, if for no other reason than birds of a feather flock together.
Here's a little something I ran across the other day.

The Assisi Cabal
Washington Dispatch ^ | 9/5/03 | Paul M. Weyrich
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/976648/posts

[texasbluebell]

I'm so convinced Iraq was behind the attacks, both 9/11 and the first WTC bombing, that it frustrates me to no end that we don't use the information we have.

I also will not be surprised to learn someday that Iraq played a hand in the OKC bombing.

The democrats would never hold public office again on a national leadership level, if we told people what we know, and also told people that the congressional leadership knew too as a result of their intelligence briefings.

That could be partly the reason why the govt is so reluctant to air these facts: it would shake the people's faith in all govt. But the more that's covered up, the more likely this will happen anyway.