Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islamic Republic of Iran intimidating Israel
IranScope ^ | 9/3/03 | Sam Ghandchi

Posted on 09/04/2003 4:26:02 PM PDT by Persia

Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) since its inception has been intimidating Israel, beginning with Khomeini's announcement of the Ghods Day in Tehran after the establishment of IRI, supposedly to defend the Palestinian people, but in reality to export Shi'a Islamism all over the Middle East. In the recent years, IRI boasting of having long range missiles reaching Israel, is doing the same kind of rhetoric Saddam initiated against Israel, that ended up in Israel's preemptive strikes on Iraq's nuclear facilities.

The IRI anti-Israeli intimidations is also reminiscent of rhetoric of IRI leaders against Iraq which ended up in Iraq's invasion of Iran with 8 years of suffering and devastation with no positive outcome for Iran. Of course Saddam's Iraq invaded Iran and it was rightly condemned and Iranians had every right and duty to resist the invaders and push them out of Iran.

Why is IRI doing all the rhetoric of Shahab Missiles to get Iran into a war situation with Israel? Haven't we learned that these intimidations can only hurt Iran and Iranians by isolating Iran more and more and putting Iran at the risk of an Israeli attack?

What is all the point of anti-Israeli nonsense? In the last 20 years, Iran has suffered in the hands of Islamists and not Zionists. Why do the Islamists and leftists always try to make Israeli-Palestinian conflict our issue? IRI tries to start a war with Israel to keep itself afloat, the same way Saddam and many Arab states including most of the Palestinian leadership have done all these years, to keep the tension with Israel to justify their own incompetence to form democratic and modern states in their own countries.

Can anybody name one state in the Middle East to be more modern and democratic for its *own* citizens than Israel? Oh please do not jump and say Palestinians are treated as second degree citizens in Israel. I know that and I condemn it. But blacks were treated as second degree citizens in law of the land not only till 1864 but even till the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S., but the United States was still a democracy for the rest of the population for hundreds of years despite the ugly part of apartheid during that history.

Let's remember that in contrast, IRI and the Arab countries do not just treat their "second" degree citizens below democratic and human rights standards, they treat all their citizens as such, and also they are all backward states which even allow the killing of heretics, or practice beheading and other cruel punishments like in Saudi Arabia, and stoning and other crimes against Iran's own citizens in the case of IRI even sanctioned in its constitution, whereas all these countries having oil are a lot richer than Israel and could have modernized and democratized a lot if they had the right leadership.

Israel has been one of the most successful countries in the Middle East, which has been able to become way more modern and democratic than all the other countries in the Middle East even without having oil revenues. The superiority of the state apparatus of Israel in the independence of its parliament and checks and balances, having real elections and not sham elections, and the social welfare and independent media and other human rights, are undeniable and their advanced state in technologies and health care are known even to Iranian people who wish medical attendance in Israeli hospitals for their loved ones, and if anybody says it is all because of dependence on the U.S., I would respond that Saudi has also been dependent on the U.S. but is a symbol of backwardness in the world and not advancement.

I have written before that "I do not approve the attacks of Israeli state against the Palestinians and if some Israel’s officials still imagine they have legitimacy of owning a piece of land in the Middle East based on whatever has been the case some thousands of years ago are wrong and the same way the Palestinians and Arabs who also imagine that because of whatever has been owned by Arabs over half a century ago to have the right to that land, are also dreaming. This is as if one keeps saying white population has no right to the U.S. land, because it belonged to Native Americans. The reality is that there is a country of Israel because of whatever historical reasons, just like all those Arab countries that exist because of some historical reasons and one better see the reality and plan on that rather than having a self-serving version of dream of history to try to solve today’s problems."

Thus basically I do not care for either side of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and I have already written in details my views of the historical issues raised, and do not need to repeat here and frankly I see it waste of time to argue these historical discussions and I prefer to focus on practical reality of the Middle East than to get drowned in history.

Iranians want good relations with Israel and it is to our advantage to learn about technical and social advancements of Israel and looking at Israel from the angle of Israel-Palestinian conflict has been a wrong approach to Israel for over 20 years. The majority of leftists who have been helping IRI all these years in continuing their lopsided view of Israel are doing a disservice to Iran and Iranians and if their so-called anti-imperialism ended up supporting an Islamist reactionary revolution in 1979, their condoning and supporting anti-Israeli rhetoric of IRI will put Iran at a situation worse than the Iran-Iraq War.

Iranians do not want a war with Israel and if IRI leaders cause a war with Israel, they are the ones who are causing another disaster for Iran and Iranians, which can hurt us like the Iran-Iraq War, and Islamists and leftists should answer for all the devastations that will follow such an outcome. They better come to grips with the new realities of the Middle East rather than putting Iran and Iranians at risk.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; southasia
Iranians as non-Arabs have no reason to be involved in Arab-Israeli conflict. Majority of Iranians would prefer 'good relations' with Israel.
1 posted on 09/04/2003 4:26:02 PM PDT by Persia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Persia
Can anybody name one state in the Middle East to be more modern and democratic for its *own* citizens than Israel?

Good argument.

2 posted on 09/04/2003 4:29:45 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
There's Qatar but I'm not sure how democratic it is. It is modern though. Qatar it ruled by a sultan but from what I remember hearing he wanted to make it a democracy because he wants the people to have a say in their lives. Not surprisingly this is a pretty pro-US country with a population that mostly supports the US presence. There's also Kuwait but I'm not sure about how democratic or modern it is but there is a large US presence and wide support for the US too.
3 posted on 09/04/2003 4:58:29 PM PDT by bitcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
There's Qatar but I'm not sure how democratic it is. It is modern though. Qatar it ruled by a sultan but from what I remember hearing he wanted to make it a democracy because he wants the people to have a say in their lives. Not surprisingly this is a pretty pro-US country with a population that mostly supports the US presence. There's also Kuwait but I'm not sure about how democratic or modern it is but there is a large US presence and wide support for the US too.
4 posted on 09/04/2003 4:58:29 PM PDT by bitcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
5 posted on 09/04/2003 6:32:21 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persia; F14 Pilot
Good post.
6 posted on 09/04/2003 6:35:47 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I'm way past sick and tired of Iran bothering Israel via their proxy HizBallah. Israel should take out the Iranian nuclear program as a warning.
7 posted on 09/04/2003 6:43:34 PM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Persia
Excellent post. I feel bad for the Iranian people, they are not Arabs, they are Persians, if I remember correctly, and should not be having this conversation.

It reminds me of a number of countries that are despotic.

Keep the peoples minds off the domestic problems, by creating an outside boogey man, so that the incompetents in power can hold on just a little longer, and who cares if it costs the lives of their own citizens or destroys their country in the process. If they are not going to have the power, then there won't be anything to have power over.

I find it sad, and the Iranian peoples cries for freedom should be heard, and cultivated and helped along, before the Mullahs really get out of hand.
8 posted on 09/04/2003 6:46:12 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Ping
9 posted on 09/04/2003 9:10:12 PM PDT by Valin (America is a vast conspiracy to make you happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitcon; Pan_Yans Wife
Re#3&4, Lebanon is another democracy in there.
10 posted on 09/05/2003 8:41:25 AM PDT by F14 Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Thank you.
11 posted on 09/05/2003 8:42:14 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000; bitcon; Persia; yonif; Pan_Yans Wife; Valin; McGavin999; Texas_Dawg
Israeli President Talks to Iranian Radio Listeners

JERUSALEM — Israel's Iranian-born president has hosted an emotional radio talk show with listeners from his native country, even as Israeli and Iranian leaders have traded barbs in recent days over Tehran's nuclear program.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,96339,00.html
12 posted on 09/05/2003 8:46:25 AM PDT by F14 Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
The former IDF Cheif, General Mofaz is Iranian as well.
13 posted on 09/05/2003 8:48:26 AM PDT by F14 Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Well this IS some good news. Nothing like going over the heads of the "leaders".
14 posted on 09/05/2003 9:02:52 AM PDT by Valin (America is a vast conspiracy to make you happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson