[Ohioan]

The Union Leader has the exact opposite history to that of the New York Times. For well over a generation, that I know of, the Union Leader has stood as one of the very few papers in America, that still honored and defended the American tradition.

If you want to criticize anyone, over this piece, it should not be the reporter--the messenger--but the corrupted fellow, being interviewed. That the news is sad, is truly sad. But if it is the news, it needs to be printed.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

[Dane]

The Union Leader has the exact opposite history to that of the New York Times. For well over a generation, that I know of, the Union Leader has stood as one of the very few papers in America, that still honored and defended the American tradition.

If you want to criticize anyone, over this piece, it should not be the reporter--the messenger--but the corrupted fellow, being interviewed. That the news is sad, is truly sad. But if it is the news, it needs to be printed

Uh Ohioan, how can I make a judgment in the first place.

The Union-Leader decided to write an editorial about the interview rather than print the uneditied transcript.

I ask the same of the NYT.