Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Altered Minds (Former drug warriors turn against prohibition.)
Reason ^ | August 29, 2003 | Jacob Sullum

Posted on 09/02/2003 1:31:59 PM PDT by Korth

In the 1980s, not many people could plausibly claim stronger anti-drug credentials than Nancy Reagan. But Forest Tennant could.

"It's great for the Reagans to get up and say, 'Let's do something about the drug problem,' but I don't know who's going to do it," he told the Los Angeles Times in 1986. "Only true professional people like myself can do very much with the drug problem."

The remark was characteristically haughty, but Tennant had the training, experience, and reputation to back it up. A physician and researcher with a doctorate in public health, he operated a chain of drug treatment clinics in California and was widely cited and consulted as an expert on drug abuse and addiction.

Tennant has published hundreds of scientific articles, testified in high-profile trials, and advised the NFL, NASCAR, the California Highway Patrol, the Food and Drug Administration, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The Times described him as "riding at the forefront of the current wave of anti-drug sentiment."

So when the folks at the Hoover Institution who produce the PBS show Uncommon Knowledge were looking for someone to debate drug policy with me, Tennant must have seemed like a natural choice. Imagine their surprise when he ended up agreeing that the war on drugs has been a disastrous mistake.

To be sure, Tennant is not completely comfortable with the idea of treating all psychoactive substances the way we treat alcohol. Among other things, he worries about underage access and legal liability issues.

But Tennant concedes that only a small percentage of drug users become addicted, that the drug laws are not very effective at preventing abuse, and that any increase in addiction that follows the repeal of prohibition is apt to be small. Equally important, he has come to realize after decades of dealing with addiction that the war on drugs imposes tremendous costs in exchange for its dubious benefits.

Tennant says the September 11 attacks had a big impact on his thinking about drug policy. He recognized that the connection between drugs and terrorism, cited by the government to justify the war on drugs, was actually a consequence of prohibition, which makes the drug trade a highly lucrative business and delivers it into the hands of criminals. "We've got to take the profit out of it," he says.

Tennant is also troubled by the impact that U.S. drug policy has on countries such as Colombia, where it empowers thugs and guerillas, sows violence, undermines law and order, and wreaks havoc on the economy. And he believes the war on drugs has fostered systemic corruption in the United States. "We need to try something different," he says.

As a first step, Tennant would like to see states experiment with various approaches to drug policy, including decriminalization of marijuana, a drug he considers much less dangerous than the government claims. He thinks it plausible that in 15 years Americans will be able to purchase pot legally.

This is the same man who made waves in the 1980s by promoting a home eye test kit to help parents detect and deter drug use by their children. Parents were supposed to administer the test every few days, beginning when their kids were about 7. No one could have accused Forest Tennant of being soft on drugs.

Tennant is by no means the only former drug warrior who has become a critic of current policy. Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), founded last year, includes more than 400 current and former police officers, judges, federal agents, prosecutors, and parole, probation, and corrections officers. The group is headed by Jack Cole, a 26-year veteran of the New Jersey State Police who worked in narcotics enforcement for 14 years.

"After three decades of fueling the US war on drugs with over half a trillion tax dollars and increasingly punitive policies," says LEAP, "illicit drugs are easier to get, cheaper, and more potent than they were 30 years ago. While our court system is choked with ever-increasing drug prosecutions, our quadrupled prison population has made building prisons this nation's fastest growing industry...Meanwhile people are dying in our streets and drug barons grow richer than ever before. We must change these policies."

As an attorney quoted in a recent Seattle Weekly article about LEAP observed, "The news story is not that the war on drugs has failed. It's who's saying it now."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: drugs; drugwar; federalgovernment; freedom; liberty; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: jmc813
...including decriminalization of marijuana, a drug he considers much less dangerous than the government claims.

I can't believe anyone would consider this guy's opinion more significant than an *admission* of the truth by Ozzy Osbourne himself!

21 posted on 09/02/2003 5:36:21 PM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
bluenoses

Ever read a short story called "Marching Morons" ?

22 posted on 09/02/2003 5:39:53 PM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yeti
"Moogs, would you buy it for a quarter?"

LOL!...C.M.Kornbluth - one of the greats!
23 posted on 09/02/2003 5:53:46 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Korth
"After three decades of fueling the US war on drugs with over half a trillion tax dollars and increasingly punitive policies," says LEAP, "illicit drugs are easier to get, cheaper, and more potent than they were 30 years ago. While our court system is choked with ever-increasing drug prosecutions, our quadrupled prison population has made building prisons this nation's fastest growing industry...Meanwhile people are dying in our streets and drug barons grow richer than ever before. We must change these policies."

I wonder what a half a trillion dollars could buy besides a failed drug war? If that were put in an interest bearing account wouldn't the interest about pay our national deficits?

24 posted on 09/02/2003 5:59:57 PM PDT by TigersEye (Regime change in the Courts. - Impeach Activist Judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JG52blackman
I totally agree with you. It just makes sense.
25 posted on 09/02/2003 9:11:46 PM PDT by vpintheak (Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: zerosix
"Natural rights are those which appertain to man in right of his existence. Of this kind are all the intellectual rights, or rights of the mind, and also all those rights of acting as an individual for his own comfort and happiness, which are not injurious to the natural rights of others." --Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1791.

The rights of one individual end where an other's rights begin.
There must be an other to steal from, murder or rape.
It is an inalienable right for an individual to plant a seed, grow and consume a gift of God.
You have the guile to advocate legalizing violent criminal acts which violate the rights of others in support of your own rights violating opinion in favor of the WOsD.

zerosix wrote: "And as to murder, or even rape, for that matter, why the desire to kill someone who has wronged you or rape a woman/child because she/he says no, is hardly acceptable in today's society, is it?"

But, you support the WOD which does the same to those that will not 'Just Say No." How is this acceptable? A country at war with its citizenry is not a 'society' by any definition of the word nor can it possess peace, particularly not for export. A "stable society" is not one in which citizens are warred upon by an evil spirit of unconstitutional nature bent on controlling the minds of the populace through false propaganda and deadly force directed by a Czar. Neither is it a stable society when an individual is imprisoned for possession of a flower from the garden of God because it may alter the thoughts in that individual in a manner deemed inappropriate by corporate pawns seeking to maintain the efficiency of their chattel.

"...declaring war against the natural rights of all mankind, and extirpating the defenders thereof from the face of the earth, is the concern of every man to whom nature hath given the power of feeling" Thomas Paine from 'Common Sense'
26 posted on 09/02/2003 9:21:45 PM PDT by PaxMacian (Gen 1:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Korth
If Tennant is so worried about drugs, maybe he should focus his attention on the Afghani heroin trade. They just brought in a record crop under U.S. occupation.

As always, the government is non-serious on the issue.
27 posted on 09/02/2003 10:23:27 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yeti
...including decriminalization of marijuana, a drug he considers much less dangerous than the government claims.

This is the problem Marijiana isn't that dangerous and most americans know it.All of us know someone who has been killed by alchohol or tobacco but I have never seen or heard of anyone killed by smoking pot.Show me the bodies? The pro legalization people and the War on drugs people have this ridiculas all or nothing attitude that just doesn't make sense.Everyone admits that drugs like heroin and methamphetimine are dangerous and should be illeagal But why not legalize the softcore stuff thats less dangerous than stuff you can leagally buy in a convieniance store?The stoners would be happy and the "drug warriors" could still chase the Cocain and heroin cartels.And we'd SAVE MONEY.duh!
28 posted on 09/02/2003 11:50:05 PM PDT by edchambers (Peace sells but who's buying?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: edchambers
Everyone admits that drugs like heroin and methamphetimine are dangerous

Yup.

and should be illeagal

Nope. Self-imposed dangers are none of the government's business.

29 posted on 09/04/2003 7:13:15 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson