Sigh. I guess a lot of people just don't take the time to read up. History shows that among the Nazi elite, as well as SA members especially, there were many, many homosexuals. Their whole philosophy was based on an ultra-masculine militaristic homo-erotic cultish crap. This is undeniably true. Homosexuals have been busy for the last 25 years revising history to suit their plea for "minority" status. Homosexuals were not sent en masse to the camps, many of the capos and camp commanders were homosexuals and sadists who raped and sexually tortured prisoners. The homosexuals who were sent were the "femme" type who were scorned by the ultra macho Nazis.
Why don't you read the books I mentioned? Inform yourself.
It still doesnt change the fact that your intolerance is a liability to the party.
First of all, if homosexuals want to vote Republican, great. The more the better. That is completely different than the Republican party making the "gay" agenda part of their platform. The Democrats already are the patrons of the homosexual agenda, we're supposed to have a two-party system.
Political alignment should have nothing to do with one's sexual orientation.
Homosexual activists have made their sex life a powerful political issue. And I'm supposed to grin and swallow it?
Political alignment should have nothing to do with one's sexual orientation.
Homosexual activists have made their sex life a powerful political issue. And I'm supposed to grin and swallow it? <<<<<
That's the way it's supposed to look. So much for my proofreading!
As I had indicated in my original post, I welcome them to the party so long as they realize that "gay rights" are counter to the party philosophy.
True, but that violates the second law of homosexuality. To wit:
To the mentally healthy person (heterosexual), sex is something they do
To the mentally diseased person ('homosexual'), sex is everything they are