[Reagan Man]

"...a valid attempt was made to rectify that mistake. "

>>>Wrong again, both the Secretary of State and the Supreme Court have ruled that it was an INVALID attempt.

An honest effort was made to rectify the problem. The courts ruled against McClintock on this specific issue. If there was more time, perhaps he would consider taking this to the federal appeals court.

However, this is a conservatism website and the idea is to support conservative candidates and oppose liberal candidates.

Don't you want conservatives to triumph over liberalism?

By supporting the California liberal establishment on this issue, you're giving credence to the liberal agenda. By condoning this wrongheaded behavior by the political party who controls the California government, you aren't championing conservative values, beliefs and principles.

[RS]

"However, this is a conservatism website and the idea is to support conservative candidates and oppose liberal candidates. "

So it's just fine to use Democrat tactics to support conservatism ?
Our guy is allowed to break the rules as long as he is OUR guy ?
Our guy is given a pass when he screws up - we will just change the rules to accomodate him ?

Anyone who does not march in lock-step with OUR guy is to be attacked ?

We will stand here and shout and LOSE any chance of actually having any effect whatsoever on the path of the government ?

FR has allways been wide open for debate, where arguements can be tested and ideas put forth that might actually be able to be put into effect.

[Dave S]

However, this is a conservatism website and the idea is to support conservative candidates and oppose liberal candidates. Don't you want conservatives to triumph over liberalism?

So in order to see conservatives triumph over liberalism, you are saying we all have to lie, even on this website? I dont think so. So much for your candidates moral stand if he attracts supporters like you. Lets see incompetent candidate and amoral in the pursuit of victory.