[RS]

"However, this is a conservatism website and the idea is to support conservative candidates and oppose liberal candidates. "

So it's just fine to use Democrat tactics to support conservatism ?
Our guy is allowed to break the rules as long as he is OUR guy ?
Our guy is given a pass when he screws up - we will just change the rules to accomodate him ?

Anyone who does not march in lock-step with OUR guy is to be attacked ?

We will stand here and shout and LOSE any chance of actually having any effect whatsoever on the path of the government ?

FR has allways been wide open for debate, where arguements can be tested and ideas put forth that might actually be able to be put into effect.

[Reagan Man]

Tom McClintock hasn't reverted to Democrat tactics.

McClintock may have made a mistake, but he immediately turned around and rectified the problem, by complying with the law. It was the liberal establishment of California who was unwilling to be give McClintock an opportunity to correct this oversight. McClintock received NO pass from anyone in the California governing establishment.

>>>Anyone who does not march in lock-step with OUR guy is to be attacked ?

We're talking about standing up to unfair treatment of a conservative. Truth is, I would be willing to give any candidate, an opportunity to rectify such an insignificant oversight.

I really don't understand your reluctance to cut Tom McClintock some slack on this issue. After all, don't all FReepers want conservatism to triumph over liberalism? Why do you take sides with California's liberal governing establishment on this issue?