Replies

Look, I'm a guy who plead your arguement in the year 2000, when I voted for Buchanan. Gore was a di-khead, but he didn't propose carving up the United States and handing over parts of it to other nations, or a new nation. Look what we got instead. Let's not get off on that right now, it'd take months to address, the flame wars fatal for many.

I recognize your right to vote for whoever you wish. I support that. So what I am saying here is academic in nature. I don't know how you could read that last post to you from me, yet still justify a McClintock vote if his numbers don't rise.

I don't think this election is going to hinge on your or my vote, so this isn't that cricital to me. I just can't understand you logic here any more than you can mine.

So what I am saying here is academic in nature. I don't know how you could read that last post to you from me, yet still justify a McClintock vote if his numbers don't rise.

Because I can't justify a vote for Arnold now that he has said that he supports the legalization of Illegals. It's that simple.
The reason we're facing the threat of Bustamante is because of GOP cowardice on Illegals for the past decade. I'm not going to reward those very cowards with a vote for their boy Arnold. I'm not gong to play into any electoral Stockholm Syndrome.
I want Illegals to be front and center in the 2004 campaign, and that's not going to happen if we vote for yet another candidate who wants to pretend they aren't a problem.