Skip to comments.
Jewish and Christian leaders launch countermissionary campaign [Fighting "Jews for Jesus" people]
Jerusalem Post ^
| Aug. 27, 2003
Posted on 08/27/2003 2:00:45 PM PDT by yonif
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-302 next last
1
posted on
08/27/2003 2:00:46 PM PDT
by
yonif
To: SJackson; Yehuda; Nachum; Paved Paradise; Mr. Mojo; Thinkin' Gal; Bobby777; adam_az; Alouette; ...
Ping.
2
posted on
08/27/2003 2:01:17 PM PDT
by
yonif
("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
To: yonif
"I am not ashamed of the gospel,
because it is
the power of God to salvation,
to the Jew first,
then to the Gentile."
A famous Jewish person wrote that.
3
posted on
08/27/2003 2:04:57 PM PDT
by
fishtank
To: yonif
I can just close the door,turn the radio to another station,throw away a letter,hang up the phone.There is no danger to someone committed to their faith.I've done these things.
4
posted on
08/27/2003 2:05:31 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: yonif
Baptists for Buddah ! Has a nice ring to it, don't you think?
To: yonif
"The term 'Jews for Jesus' makes about as much sense as 'Baptists for Buddha' or 'Catholics for Krishna,'" she said. The Apostles were Jews. They were Jews for Jesus. The early Church was mostly Jewish. They were Jews for Jesus.
It seems a bit queer that an allegedly Jewish person can't (won't?) understand that.
6
posted on
08/27/2003 2:08:32 PM PDT
by
Dataman
To: Dataman
It seems a bit queer that an allegedly Jewish person can't (won't?) understand that. YEs, but it is very deceptive to try and trick Jews into conversion instead of an honest presentation and plea for their salvation. "Jews for Jesus" is no different from Scientology in its approach.
7
posted on
08/27/2003 2:13:01 PM PDT
by
montag813
It's EEEEEEEEE-vil Christianity again, the scourge a little more tolerable than Islam...
8
posted on
08/27/2003 2:13:16 PM PDT
by
At _War_With_Liberals
(If Hillary ever takes the oath of office, she will be the last President the US will ever have. -RR)
To: yonif
"This isn't about free speech," said Rochelle Wilner, president of B'nai Brith Canada. "Targeted missionizing, especially when done in a manner calculated to deceive the unsuspecting, is offensive to our community. Christianity is not a branch of Judaism it's a different religion altogether, and any attempt to portray it as anything but a different religion is subterfuge. "The term 'Jews for Jesus' makes about as much sense as 'Baptists for Buddha' or 'Catholics for Krishna,'" she said.What about "Jews for Buddha?" I don't recall the Jewish community ever getting worked up about the trend of liberal Jews to explore things like Buddhism.
Anyway, if there were "Muslims for Kali," I'll believe just about any combination of religions.
9
posted on
08/27/2003 2:13:32 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: At _War_With_Liberals
"Calling it the "Proud to be Jewish" Campaign," B'nai Brith's goal..."
If another group pulled this, it would be 'supremecist'.
10
posted on
08/27/2003 2:15:06 PM PDT
by
At _War_With_Liberals
(If Hillary ever takes the oath of office, she will be the last President the US will ever have. -RR)
To: yonif
Christianity is not a branch of Judaism it's a different religion altogether, and any attempt to portray it as anything but a different religion is subterfuge. "The term 'Jews for Jesus' makes about as much sense as 'Baptists for Buddha' or 'Catholics for Krishna,'" she said. Pop quiz:
1. Jesus was a...
a. Buddhist
b. Krishan
c. Muslim
d. Jew
2. The apostles were...
a. Buddhists
b. Krishas
c. Muslims
d. Jews
3. The prophets who foretold Jesus's coming were...
a. Buddhists
b. Krishas
c. Muslims
d. Jews
4. The many disciples who followed Jesus were...
a. Buddhists
b. Krishas
c. Muslims
d. Jews
5. Jesus taught in...
a. Mecca, Medina, and the Saudi peninsula
b. India and the far east
c. America
d. Jerusalem, synagogues and the surrounding community
11
posted on
08/27/2003 2:15:57 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Christianity, if false, is unimportant and, if true, of infinite importance. - C.S. Lewis)
To: yonif
How are the in-your-face tactics of Jews for Jesus "deceptive"?
A) They are (according to the rabbis) Jews. (though not very proper Jews).
B) They are "for Jesus."
---How could they possibly be more straightfoward?
To: montag813
YEs, but it is very deceptive to try and trick Jews into conversion instead of an honest presentation and plea for their salvation. "Jews for Jesus" is no different from Scientology in its approach. You've got to be kidding. There is no need to trick anyone into belief. Leave that to evolutionists and cults. JFJ is legit, and Jay Sekulow vouches for them.
13
posted on
08/27/2003 2:17:11 PM PDT
by
Dataman
To: yonif
"The term 'Jews for Jesus' makes about as much sense as 'Baptists for Buddha' or 'Catholics for Krishna,'" she said.If Buddha were a disciple of Charles Spurgeon who had come up with a radical persepctive on the Westminster Confession or if Krishna was a highly controversial Catholic theologian this statement might make sense.
Apparently she does not understand that Jesus and his disciple Paul were born and raised as Jews and considered themselves to be faithful Jews.
To the best of my knowledge Buddha did not think of himself as a Five Point Calvinist and Krishna was never baptized catholic.
14
posted on
08/27/2003 2:17:13 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
To: yonif
What is it that defines wether one is Jewish? Is it a religion or a nationality?
Is it possible to not believe in the Jewish religion and still be a Jew?
I've heard many Jewish folk refer to themselves as non-practicing Jews. According to the logic of those in this article that is not a valid position.
15
posted on
08/27/2003 2:17:55 PM PDT
by
lews
( - Just Curious)
To: Nonstatist
Baptists for Buddah ! Has a nice ring to it, don't you think? Naw, too exclusionary! I prefer Hooray For Everything!
(Credit the Simpsons for this one!)
16
posted on
08/27/2003 2:18:20 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(Go ahead, make my day and re-state the obvious! Again!)
To: pgyanke
5. Jesus taught in... a. Mecca, Medina, and the Saudi peninsula
b. India and the far east
c. America
d. Jerusalem, synagogues and the surrounding community
There are a lot of whack jobs out there who would answer this question with: e. All of the above.
17
posted on
08/27/2003 2:20:35 PM PDT
by
fishtank
To: pgyanke
I'm all for education about being Jewish. I once spoke with a college-educated jewish woman who told me:
"Jesus wasn't Jewish!"
"Are you sure?" I asked
"He couldn't be," she explained. " He was catholic.... Everybody knows his mother was Mary!"
To: Dataman
"It seems a bit queer that an allegedly Jewish person can't (won't?) understand that."
You have no idea!...LOL As a Messianic Jew that accepted Christ as his Lord and savior almost 30 years ago, I regularly witness to other Jews. Because I have Christ in my life does not mean that I have ceased to be a Jew. I am just a complete Jew whose Messiah has arrived.
Conveying the concept of a Trinity to a practicing Jew is much akin to banging your head against a brick wall. It can be done, but it's gonna really hurt. It is a concept that is absolutely antithetical to Jewish teaching. The most essential of prayers, the Shma...in English for you non-Hebrew literate types...goes:
Hear O Israel the Lord thy God is one Lord.
...as in not three. Trust me it is a difficult concept to convey to someone that has been taught all their life that such an idea is heretical.
As for me, God had to kick me in the head three times before I figured it out. I've always felt that if he was willing to give me two extra shots, then the least I can do is try to bring other Jews into the fold.
-Toonces
19
posted on
08/27/2003 2:24:10 PM PDT
by
Toonces T. Cat
(The Token Republican in Deep South Texas...)
To: Dataman
The Apostles were Jews. They were Jews for Jesus. The early Church was mostly Jewish. They were Jews for Jesus. It seems a bit queer that an allegedly Jewish person can't (won't?) understand that.
No disrespect is intended, but can one be Christian without acknoledging the divinity of Jesus? Or if one rejects that belief? When one disregards the main tennant of faith, one is no longer an adherant to that faith.
One of the main tennants of Judism is that the messiah has not come, and we're still waiting for that event. When one acknowledges that Jesus is the messiah, then that person has abandoned his faith for another. I'm not saying that it's right or wrong. Just stating a fact.
It doesn't matter what one was before the acceptance of a set of beliefs in a faith. What matters is what one is now...
Mark
20
posted on
08/27/2003 2:26:58 PM PDT
by
MarkL
(Get something every day from the four basic food groups: canned, frozen, fast and takeout)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-302 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson