Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MagnoliaMS
"He would lose the money. That's the whole thing in a nutshell. It's all about the money."

Yep. Did he have life insurance on her?

100 posted on 08/27/2003 5:01:41 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: cake_crumb
I'm not really sure. I just remember reading that there was quite a large amount of money that was supposedly earmarked for her, and her rehabilitation. He was appointed guardian, or conservator. But he didn't see fit to spend the money on her rehabilitation, and it seems that he feels what is left of it is his, and his alone.

And someone please help me here: Did I not read that when the feeding tube is removed, the hospital/parents are NOT ALLOWED to try feeding her, to see if she can survive without the tube? I have not been able to keep up with this day by day, but I do check it out as often as possible.
101 posted on 08/27/2003 5:10:47 PM PDT by MagnoliaMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson