To: ALOHA RONNIE
...California's Answer lays in having a Repbublican Spending Veto sitting its Governor's Chair... ...no matter what. Is money more important than life?
26 posted on
08/26/2003 9:02:52 AM PDT by
unspun
("Do everything in love." | No I don't look anything like her but I do like to hear "Unspun w/ AnnaZ")
To: unspun
is "life" on the ballot?
29 posted on
08/26/2003 9:16:26 AM PDT by
Smogger
To: unspun
That life comment is very dishonest. Schwarzenegger cannot affect abortion policy. Abortion policy will only be effected by new cases brought before the Supreme Court. If it were otherwise no abortions would be taking place in Texas or Florida.
To: unspun
...A REPUBLICAN Governor =
...A Healthy California
...A DEMOCRAT Governor =
...A Dying California
96 posted on
08/26/2003 11:31:46 AM PDT by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com ..)
To: unspun
Is money more important than life? If you're referring to the abortion issue, no, money isn't more important than life. But tell me how abortion plays out in this election, why it's a crucial issue in a governor's race, particularly in a recall election which was prompted by the fiscal crisis in the state.
164 posted on
08/26/2003 1:24:33 PM PDT by
My2Cents
("I'm the party pooper..." -- Arnold in "Kindergarten Cop.")
To: unspun; DoughtyOne
yours was a dishonest question u/s... and of the typical "baiting" variety being used by "one issue" and "true conservative" voters who are neither republican or conservatives. They usually originate from "religious socialists" or "wedge issue" plants that have ulterior motives... either xpanding their own "new and improved" conservative party or drawing off support for their guaranteed "loser" but "true conservative" heros. And at times they are backed by democrats who will split any hair to keep a republican from being elected.
The more accurate question (and honest one too) in the context of this election in California is "Is it more important to stop women from killing their babies, than it is to feed your own? Isn't it more important even if we lose the election and the children will be put to death (in that case) anyway?"
Answer: "NO."
Suggestion for one issue voters: Please let us take care of our own families and economic needs... and simultaneously work on changing people's hearts instead of trying to instantly criminalize all the "evil women" as our own children do without, we lose our homes, our local churches fail and we experience continued collapse of the free worlds fifth largest economy.
Your question as phrased presents a very FALSE and dishonest dichotomy.
Although I am sure you can expect THE "true conservatives" to agree with you and "real conservatives" to start pointing these false dichotomies out...
D-1 was right to call you on it. He's no abortion proponent. I resent the insinuation that refusal to support Mc, is in any way an endorsement of infanticide...
179 posted on
08/26/2003 2:05:14 PM PDT by
Robert_Paulson2
(We need a new war... the *--WAR on GLUTTONY--* to save America...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson