Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator
What makes McClintock "unelectable"? Didn't he score more votes than Simon, and for a lesser-known office, and with a pitiful fraction of the money, in the last statewide election?

You've *GOT* to be *KIDDING*. What *DIFFERENCE* does it make if McClintock got more votes than *SIMON*? McClintock *LOST* that race to Steve Westly, an *EMPTY SUIT* with *NO* political experience! If McClintock couldn't win an *EASY* race like that, how is he going to win *THIS* one?

McClintock is a proven *LOSER*. Go Arnold!

Every vote for McClintock is a vote for *GOVERNOR BUSTAMANTE*!

22 posted on 08/23/2003 11:48:15 AM PDT by Sir Valentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Valentino
May I suggest learning some HTML? The asterisks and capital letters get a bit repetitive after a while. For example:

McClintock is not the only Republican to have lost in the 2002 election. Does this mean every person who ever runs for office and fails is a "loser" who can never win again? I pointed out that more people voted for him than Simon as evidence that McClintock is a more attractive candidate than Simon.

So then, with respect to an Arnold/McClintock decision, for the conservative... do you support the guy who approves of child sacrifice, the gay agenda, and has indicated that even more taxation might be in order, or do you vote for the guy who is against all of that and in addition wants to do something serious to deal with the crippling problem of illegal immigration?

Personally, I don't see how someone who can choose Arnold over McClintock can claim to be a conservative.

I guess my final caveat is:

Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it.

33 posted on 08/23/2003 11:59:11 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Are we conservatives, or are we Republicans?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Valentino
McClintock is a proven *LOSER*. Go Arnold!

So was Abraham Lincoln...

39 posted on 08/23/2003 12:02:23 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (I need a new tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Valentino
* HI ** HOW* ARE*** *YOU*?* **** !! **
53 posted on 08/23/2003 12:13:21 PM PDT by bluefish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Valentino
So wait, you're ripping on Westly as an empty suit but you're promoting... Arnold?

Nice job at consistency there, pal.
157 posted on 08/23/2003 2:22:52 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (TOM McCLINTOCK is my choice for governor. He should be yours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Valentino
*WHAT* in the *WORLD* is the *DEAL* with all the *ASTERISKS* and *CAPS*? It's *TOUGH* to read *YOUR* posts when they are *FILLED* with this *STUFF*.

Stick with plain old upper and lowercase letters, or learn a little HTML to emphaisze your key phrases like this. You may well have some interesting things to contribute, but it's hard to tell when your text is clanging against my eyeballs.

219 posted on 08/23/2003 7:48:42 PM PDT by Denver Ditdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson