Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recourse
You can see that where Perot was a factor, he took almost all Republican votes.

Yes...but what I'm saying is George I had lost them anyway. It just might be that a lot of those Perot voters (disgusted Republicans) would have stayed home or voted for Clinton.

187 posted on 08/23/2003 3:12:54 PM PDT by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: grania
Your out of your gord if you think any but a VERY few (I'm thinking 4 digits) would have voted Clinton. Bush 41 woulda walked in if it wern't for Perot.

And if all of you McClintiacks insist on riding with him, your going to ride right over a cliff.

A vote for McClintock, as admirable of a man as he might be, is a vote for Bustamante. Save your strength, and Toms, for Boxer.

190 posted on 08/23/2003 3:16:19 PM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

To: grania; Recourse
Recourse: You can see that where Perot was a factor, he took almost all Republican votes.

Grania: Yes...but what I'm saying is George I had lost them anyway

I'm going to agree with Grania. George HW Bush was conducting a stupid campaign, "read my lips" haunted him, he was acting like a whiney brat, not at all presidential, making himself very hard to vote for. George HW must accept responsibility for losing those votes before Perot was able to snatch them up.

216 posted on 08/23/2003 7:01:05 PM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson