Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/22/2003 5:43:05 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
Judge Starr is a really prodigious intellect.

It's a pity he purposefully 'threw' the impeachment case.

2 posted on 08/22/2003 5:46:40 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I have decided that I will follow the free trade policy of the most recent person who posts to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Thank you for giving us Sandra Day O' Commie and for burying the crimes of the Clinton administration for eternity. Now shut up and go away, Mr. Starr.
3 posted on 08/22/2003 5:48:36 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Oh, and send back all that Chicom money that lines your pockets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The McInsane-Feingevelt Constitutionally Forcible Rape scheme has failed. Money still gets into politcs. And all the law does is restrict legitimate freedom of speech. Its completely unconstitutional of course. But that didn't deter a majority of our Congressmen and Senators, egged on by the media, from violating their oath of office to uphold the Constitution. Ironically, the Democrats who were the biggest supporters of this stupid idea are now trying to get around it for it prevents them from raising adequate funds. Talk about the law of unintended consequences coming back to bite liberals on their behinds.
4 posted on 08/22/2003 5:50:57 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson; BartMan1
��5{��������e minors provision: Ironically, Sens. McCain and Feingold, who intervened in the lawsuit specifically to defend the constitutionality of their law, have abandoned their defense of that provision in the Supreme Court -- thereby leaving the dirty work to the solicitor general, who is duty bound to defend any statute, no matter how unwise, that Congress sees fit to pass

Would that the Supreme Court could extract something from McCain and Feingold (their teeth?) for this excreble monstrosity.

5 posted on 08/22/2003 5:56:05 AM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
"Congress shall make no law"----seems plain enough that even a Supreme Court justice should be able to understand--
10 posted on 08/22/2003 6:12:57 AM PDT by rellimpank (Stop immigration now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson