Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Erik Latranyi
yada,yada.. You want to talk about bad training and the equipment you think every police officer has with them.

blah, blah, blah

The Pensylvanina Highway Patrol is the pre-eminent law enforcement body in PA, are you telling me they have no budget for batons, OC, etc? (I'm sure Hillary would tell us it's Bush's fault)

Some poorly equiped PSP members:

You don't know me at all, when you speak of my contempt for police. I have served with PA Highway Patrolmen and in the past counted them amongst my friends. I save my contempt for cops who shoot first. Like any other profession there are good and bad members. In law enforcement, the bad must go.

I socialize and shoot with cops every weekend.

All the cops I know, would probably agree with me, based on the articles, that these cops are bad actors, give the rest a bad name and should seek other employment opportunities.

I've explained myself enough, why do you defend these cops, based on these articles?

Do you defend their use of deadly force, before using OC, batons, etc?

How could a rake have been used in a deadly manner by a little guy against two cops in body armor?

Should the cops have taken him into custody when he was across the street behaving calmly?

Is it good police work to allow a situation to escalate so badly?

Why didn't the cops back off from the suspect to give him a chance to 'wind down' before plugging him?

Have you read the 'candlestick' thread where the cop shot a delusional women swinging a candlestick? Do you feel that was justified?

Are you of the opinion that cops can do no wrong? Do you realize the harm of that in a free republic?

183 posted on 08/22/2003 11:54:14 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: TC Rider
... based on the articles, that these cops are bad actors....

But that's just the problem. These cops may be bad actors, or they may have acted properly. We just don't know -- we've only got a couple of news articles to go from.

185 posted on 08/22/2003 12:02:29 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: TC Rider
"I save my contempt for cops who shoot first."


And to hell with the facts!
202 posted on 08/22/2003 2:07:27 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: TC Rider
"I've explained myself enough, why do you defend these cops, based on these articles? "


Why do you convict and condem them based on these articles?
203 posted on 08/22/2003 2:08:44 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: TC Rider
"Are you of the opinion that cops can do no wrong? Do you realize the harm of that in a free republic? "


Once again, you try to put words in my mouth. I said before that there are good and bad police officers.

However, to call them executioners and killers without the facts is slanderous and liberal in its roots. This is what we hear from Sharpton, Hillary, etc after a police shooting.

I thought I would find more restrained intelligence here.

205 posted on 08/22/2003 2:10:57 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson