Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
The Ninth Amendment was a constraint on the federal government , not a license for the federal courts, the third branch of the federal government, to make laws.

You're arguing my first point--that the 9th Amendment is essentially the same as the 10th. I find it very difficult to believe the Founders would include a superfluous amendment, so I don't buy that explanation.

795 posted on 08/21/2003 5:34:08 PM PDT by Viva Le Dissention
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 792 | View Replies ]


To: Viva Le Dissention
You're arguing my first point--that the 9th Amendment is essentially the same as the 10th.

No, they overlap but are not essentially the same. They both place constraints on the federal government while the Tenth Amendment acknolwedges powers that are the states. Big difference unless you're a central government kind of guy.

I find it very difficult to believe the Founders would include a superfluous amendment, so I don't buy that explanation.

I'm not selling anything, just the facts Ma'am just the facts, as Joe Friday was wont to say.

It wasn't superfluous in their minds. The Anti Federalists feared an all powerful Central Government. They were prescient. LOL

803 posted on 08/21/2003 5:41:32 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 795 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson