Moore's stance is that he recognizes no power here on Earth, he will not obey the rule of law, and will not observe the orderly legal process he swore tro uphold. He will not follow a Court order, even though he has arrested people in the past for disobeying his own Court orders.
If he's not advancing a theocracy, what exactly is he doing?
Dear Luis, what do you think an inalienable right is, if not something over which no power on earth has authority, and no right to abrogate?
...he will not obey the rule of law...
What do you mean by the "rule of law"? Anything a court says? If that were the case courts should be considered infallible in all their decisions, and would never be appealed or overruled.
...and will not observe the orderly legal process he swore to uphold.
As far as I know, he has appealed the order in a timely fashion to the Supreme Court. What about that is not observing the orderly legal process? My own opinion is that the Court that issued the order has no authority to issue such an order dealing with the erection of a monument in a State, and so such order is null and void. Just my two cents.
Cordially,