Dear Luis, what do you think an inalienable right is, if not something over which no power on earth has authority, and no right to abrogate?
...he will not obey the rule of law...
What do you mean by the "rule of law"? Anything a court says? If that were the case courts should be considered infallible in all their decisions, and would never be appealed or overruled.
...and will not observe the orderly legal process he swore to uphold.
As far as I know, he has appealed the order in a timely fashion to the Supreme Court. What about that is not observing the orderly legal process? My own opinion is that the Court that issued the order has no authority to issue such an order dealing with the erection of a monument in a State, and so such order is null and void. Just my two cents.
Cordially,
"What do you mean by the "rule of law"? Anything a court says?"
When you are a member of that Court system, yes, I expect you to comply with the orderly process as proscribed in State's statutes.
"My own opinion is that the Court that issued the order has no authority to issue such an order dealing with the erection of a monument in a State, and so such order is null and void. Just my two cents."
In this case, the Chief Magistrate of the State Court is the defendant, the citizens who filed the charges need to have a venue to air their grievances. How far do you think they would have gotten filing the same complaint in Moore's Alabama Court system? r do you think that the citizens of Alabama have no venue and no recourse in this matter?
Scary thought.