Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State of denial: Grounds for anger (California plunders neighbors)
Sacramento Bee ^ | 8-17-03 | Tom Knudson

Posted on 08/17/2003 8:45:42 AM PDT by hoosierskypilot

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:55:52 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Three years ago, the view from Cheryl Millican's waterfront home on a quiet bay north of Vancouver, British Columbia, was exquisite. Each day brought a fresh palette of wave and wind. Sunsets were sublime -- splashes of lilac, streaks of rose and layers of lemon that transformed evening meals on the deck with her husband and son into artistic events.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 08/17/2003 8:45:43 AM PDT by hoosierskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Her view is history.

You want the view? Spend your own money and buy the property. If you are unwilling to pay the price, don't whine about it when someone else is.

2 posted on 08/17/2003 8:49:34 AM PDT by jimkress (Go away Pat Go away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Kalifornia would be a better place for the country if they turned it all into gravel pits and illegal employment centers (aka; agriculture opportunities)
3 posted on 08/17/2003 8:58:00 AM PDT by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Californians won't use their own natural resources, and they feel guilty using someone else's.

The solution, it seems to me, is to quit using natural resources. Just stop entirely.

Sit around and hum, perhaps.

4 posted on 08/17/2003 9:00:42 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I think the good news is the employees of the Baja Ca sand and gravel pits are not illegal aliens.

I would propose getting a lot of sand and gravel by digging a moat along the southern border of the US. Really deep. With a strong fence, for the sake of safety at the northern edge.

5 posted on 08/17/2003 9:07:44 AM PDT by donmeaker (Bigamy is one wife too many. So is monogamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Good idea, but the environmentalists would never allow that.

The mere suggestion of this, though, proves that the Bush Administration is in bed with Big Gravel.

6 posted on 08/17/2003 9:10:39 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
I live on the outskirts of Sacramento. Every day to get to town I drive by mile after mile of active gravel pits. This article is simply an example of the environmental-wacko demofascist "reporting" that we get with the Bee. It bears little relation to reality.
7 posted on 08/17/2003 9:13:04 AM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
The problem is not sand and gravel mining, it is illegal immigration!

Without the huge infux of millions of illegals, the population would be generally stable and the infrastructure adequate, proceeding at a saner pace.

Kalifornia had a net outflow of 750,000 citizens since 1995, but this mumber was overwhelmed by nearly 5 million immigrants, most of them illegal. Stop that problem, and most of the rest are solveable without harsh means.

8 posted on 08/17/2003 9:20:10 AM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Either that, or require illegal immigrants to bring sand and gravel with them.
9 posted on 08/17/2003 9:24:17 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Ack, what a long article about sand and gravel. I'm sorry to say I found this very dull and boring, no pun intended. I don't know what to do about this problem, Gritty, I defer to you! You got the name, you get the game!
10 posted on 08/17/2003 9:26:27 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Too Bad!

Everyone wants things around their neighborhood to stay just the way they were...Its a simplistic view..truly childlike....And completely unjustified.


11 posted on 08/17/2003 9:29:32 AM PDT by rmvh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
"Every citizen in California demands a particular lifestyle, yet they do not want to take responsibility for the things it takes to support that lifestyle. We need sand and gravel." and oil, and electricity and clean water. But we don't want to muck up our state so lets take Washington's power(we are too enviro conscious to build our own plants) Oregon's water (they are just a bunch of farmers) and BC's gravel. What we really need to save the enviroment is for the whole damn state of Calif to slide off into the ocean. OK maybe just the southern half.
12 posted on 08/17/2003 9:33:59 AM PDT by mamarainsberry (I am a duh-duh-duh democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I was thinking this might be a good thing, after all.

Our architects will have to use less concrete, and perhaps that will mean more attractive buildings in the future.

Concrete's about the ugliest material I know.

D
13 posted on 08/17/2003 9:46:41 AM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis
You could make them out of wood, but that would offend Gaia. And iron mining isn't much different from gravel mining.

No, the solution is to stop building stuff.

14 posted on 08/17/2003 9:53:48 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

But today, the state's passion for protecting its own back yard from the dust, noise and scars of mining and its penchant for building homes over rich reserves is beginning to shift the pain of producing those natural resources to other landscapes and cultures.

Excuse me but don't we live in the age of importation of everything except jobs?  We export our jobs and import everything else.  What else is new Sacramento Bee?  Where have you been for the last decade?  When people mine for minerals, someone in that area makes a lot of money.  People are employed there.  The region experiences an influx of money.  Duh!  Anotherwords, that one person you found with a dusty balcony is balanced by a number of other people who can afford to put food on the table or perhaps buy a second car, maybe even take a vacation this year for the first time in a decade.

One of my first clues to the mindset of the person writing this article is highlighted in red above.  Sprawl is the latest catch-phrase of the rabid environmentalist.

Perhaps this nitwit can figure out why we have such a demand for new homes in California.  I'll give you a clue, citizens are leaving the state in record numbers.

15 posted on 08/17/2003 10:06:42 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ("He's baaaaack!" Now is he on our side or the side of the (political bigger is better) machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
But, shouldn't we take all the trees and put them in a tree museum? Then we could charge all the people a dollar and a half just to see them
16 posted on 08/17/2003 10:32:58 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I like the way you think.
17 posted on 08/17/2003 10:35:07 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
From a related article (http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/mexico/20030130-9999_1n30sand.html}:

"...a joint venture called Petreos del Pacifico... The company was formed in 2001 by a well-established Baja California construction company, Amaya Curiel, and British-based Hanson Aggregates, which has offices in San Diego... ...General Manager Roberto Curiel Ortega said Petreos del Pacifico has invested close to $40 million to develop the infrastructure for sand and rock mining, including a port facility at Ensenada and barges to carry the material to California..."

Presumably this company was providing jobs to an area that otherwise wouldn't offer much opportunity? The thing that is so striking about Mexico is how rich it is in possibilities and how resistant the leadership is to those very things which would allow the country to prosper.





18 posted on 08/17/2003 10:37:12 AM PDT by Sabatier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I love your profile!
19 posted on 08/17/2003 10:37:16 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hoosierskypilot
Not to worry, Kalifornia is too broke to buy dirt, even dirt cheap.
20 posted on 08/17/2003 10:37:38 AM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson