To: RightWingNilla; StolarStorm
Not following. Essentially StolarStorm said that creationism was not science and a waste of time, maybe specifically for only this thread, but I got the impression for any science thread. Now you actively seek the creationist viewpoint on this thread. Those are contradictory viewpoints.
922 posted on
08/18/2003 1:17:41 PM PDT by
AndrewC
To: AndrewC
see 918
To: AndrewC
"Now you actively seek the creationist viewpoint on this thread. Those are contradictory viewpoints."
The thread clearly evolved into a evolution/creationism debate thread. I didn't start it... I just got into the spirit of it. But normally, I really wish we kept these debates limited to threads devoted to the evo/crevo discussion rather than flooding every science thread with creationsim info... as well as flooding every creationism thread with evolution info.
To: AndrewC; RightWingNilla; StolarStorm
Essentially StolarStorm said that creationism was not science and a waste of time...Now you actively seek the creationist viewpoint on this thread. Those are contradictory viewpoints. What he actually said was
It would be nice if the creationists would simply stop trying to 'witness' on the science threads
Which I interpreted as asking for scientific evidence, as opposed to Scriptural interpretations. The precise meaning of Genesis is not a scientific question, it's a theological one, and doesn't belong in a discussion of science.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson