To: Aric2000
What was that all about?
Sacred column?
Sacred? OMG, what a bizarre concept and totally laughable.
The column is sacred to the theory of evolution. Try to suggest it is invalid and see the response. Actually, just read your own asinine comments. Evolutionists look like this
whenever refuting evidence is pointed out because if the column falls, so does the theory.
To: DittoJed2; AndrewC
"Actually, just read your own asinine comments."
Does this sort of statement comply?
To: DittoJed2
The column is a fact, not a scared anything.
To try to explain it with a worldwide flood is ridiculous and absolutely laughable.
You wish to believe it though, it's OK with me, but to try and make science take such a thing seriously will be quite impossible.
Science has the evidence, and no amount of whining on your part will change that.
Again, there is absolutley NO credible evidence of a worldwide flood catastrophy, there is absolutely NO credible evidence that the earth is 6-10,000 years old.
Any such claims on your part is to help you fulfill your faith that the bible is unerring, nothing more.
839 posted on
08/18/2003 12:03:01 PM PDT by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson