[Aric2000]

The column is a fact, not a scared anything.

To try to explain it with a worldwide flood is ridiculous and absolutely laughable.

You wish to believe it though, it's OK with me, but to try and make science take such a thing seriously will be quite impossible.

Science has the evidence, and no amount of whining on your part will change that.

Again, there is absolutley NO credible evidence of a worldwide flood catastrophy, there is absolutely NO credible evidence that the earth is 6-10,000 years old.

Any such claims on your part is to help you fulfill your faith that the bible is unerring, nothing more.

[DittoJed2]

The column is a fact, not a scared anything.

Aside from typing skills, you apparently need to learn the difference between unsubstantiated assertions and facts. You also need to do a little research on flood geology with an open mind, which your posts indicate you do not possess. If the earth were proved to be old, it would not affect my faith. The theory of evolution has never been proven and if the column falls so does the theory. Hince, its "sacred" nature (sacred:5 a : UNASSAILABLE, INVIOLABLE b : highly valued and important ) in the eyes of evolutionists such as yourself. You simply will not even CONSIDER the fact that the column is not true. This is not evidentiary, but faith-based. You are entitled to believe it, but it is YOU who cannot let go of an essential part of a theory lest your belief collapse.