Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
But there was much discussion of the incident, and it was generally agreed that the freepmail had to be disclosed, and that there is no rule against doing so.

Didn't the Democrats cry foul when Bill Clinton's fleering letter to the man who granted his draft exemption was disclosed?

586 posted on 08/17/2003 6:10:39 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]


To: Physicist
Didn't the Democrats cry foul when Bill Clinton's fleering letter to the man who granted his draft exemption was disclosed?

Suppressing damaging evidence is a great tactic. When it fails, Plan B is to attack the people who disclosed it. But nobody is really fooled. Well, fools are fooled, but that's in the nature of things.

589 posted on 08/17/2003 6:18:50 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson