Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DittoJed2
Clarification on my previous post (which I'll admit was a little confusing). Lizards are ectotherms as opposed to endotherms. Dinosaurs are also ectotherms as well. They are just great big lizards, in other words. An example of a non-creationist who agrees is found here:http://oregonstate.edu/dept/science-record/dinos.html
24 posted on 08/13/2003 10:29:37 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: DittoJed2
By the way, dinosaurs were reptiles as are lizards. Lizards are ectotherms, not just "cold-blooded". Their body temperature varies.

This much is correct.

Clarification on my previous post (which I'll admit was a little confusing). Lizards are ectotherms as opposed to endotherms.

And so is this.

Dinosaurs are also ectotherms as well. They are just great big lizards, in other words.

This, on the other hand... Dinosaurs may or may not have been ectotherms. There's a lot of debate and contradictory evidence about that. One of the latest views is that they actually had some features of both ectothermic and endothermic metabolisms (i.e., it may not be either-or, they may have been sort of in-between).

But even if they were ectothermic, that does *not* make them "big lizards". Ectothermia is hardly the defining characteristic of what makes a reptile a lizard. If it were, turtles and snakes would be "lizards" as well, and they're not.

Dinosaurs are their own distinct category, as specialized and different from lizards as lizards are from snakes/turtles.

27 posted on 08/14/2003 1:32:24 AM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson