To: DittoJed2
By the way, there are continental shelves surrounding the continents and land bridges that could explain how people got from point A to point B. How (and why) did the kangaroos and other Australian marsupials walk from Noah's Ark to Australia, and why did they all go there and nowhere else?
How about the New Zealand fauna? It's way the heck out in the ocean by itself, that must have been an impressive land bridge.
To: Ichneumon
How (and why) did the kangaroos and other Australian marsupials walk from Noah's Ark to Australia, and why did they all go there and nowhere else?How about the New Zealand fauna? It's way the heck out in the ocean by itself, that must have been an impressive land bridge.
LOL!! Remember, there's nothing more implausible than humans and apes sharing a common ancestor.
If you acknowledge this fact, coming up with "hydroplate" theories or scenarios where animals walk back to their original habitat from mount Ararat in a devastated world, is not really a problem.
1,793 posted on
08/21/2003 4:04:34 AM PDT by
BMCDA
To: Ichneumon
Another word - the word "could". It is a hypothesis. As I stated earlier, the Bible seems to indicate the continents were at one point closer together. Then the earth was broken up (during the time of Peleg). I reject the Pangea model because it has to shrink Africa and ignores other countries in central and south America. Because of erosion, shrinking Africa in the very beginning should result in an even smaller country today, not bigger.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson