Replies

Is there any evidence that would cause you to abandon the theory of evolution and accept a literal Genesis account of creation? If so, second question, what kind of evidence would it take. Please describe.

There are three tasks that the evidence would have to perform.

The hard task is that it would have to provide much of the (hitherto undiscovered) evidence we would expect easily to have found, were the Biblical account factually true.

The much harder task is that it would have to discredit several enormous bodies of evidence that objective scientists have painstakingly compiled over the last five hundred years, evidence from which our currently accepted models have been derived.

The very hardest task is that it would have to explain why the accepted models have hitherto worked so startlingly well, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and coming both from the direction of observation and from the direction of theory. Furthermore, the new evidence would also have to explain why the Biblical claims have hitherto been in such miserable disagreement with the old evidence.

Regarding the hard task, there is a lot of evidence archaeological, historical, etc., that suggests the Bible is accurate.

Regarding the harder task, 500 years of scholarship has not discredited Creation. Evolution has only been popular around 140 years. And, creationists have provided evidence that flies in the face of evolution. I understand that this group does not accept this evidence, but many scientists have and have accepted at least some form of Creation as a possible scenario.

Regarding the hardest task, I would say that many of the techniques of evolution have not worked all that well. Take Radiometric dating for example. Its numbers are all over the map and frequently one dating method doesn't work with another. Another, and more core issue is science has never been able to take absolutely nothing and make nothing a living organism. You can't take a bunch of minerals, squish them together, and make life. You can add other living matter and "create" something living, but you have to start with something that is already there. You also don't have "kinds" of creatures, such as humans and apes, being able to reproduce after one another. You can mate types of horses and get more types of horses. You can mate dogs and get dogs. These things probably had a common ancestor. But just because there is physical similarity between different kinds does not mean that they have the same ancestor.

As far as the Biblical claims being opposed to the Old Evidence, I would have to see some examples before I could address the subject.