[DittoJed2]

Argument from Majority opinion is invalid. Likewise, your unsubstantiated assertions are abundant. Behe is a scientist who has spent much time studying the complexity of the universe. Evolution can't explain what Behe witnessed. So, you call him ignorant and lazy. You are showing when an evolutionist doesn't like the evidence then he discounts it outright and starts attacking the person instead. Behe's work stands. You can reject it, but your rebuttal is extremely weak.

[Aric2000]

Give me a freaking break, you are just too funny.

Irreducibly Complex is NOT science, it's a throw your hands in the air and give up.

Irreducibly complex means that the answer is beyond you and it is time for someone with more brainpower to figure it out.

It is nothing but laziness or ignorance, again, take your pick.

[RightWingNilla]

Behe is a scientist who has spent much time studying the complexity of the universe. Evolution can't explain what Behe witnessed.

As has been pointed out to many creationists here already, Behe does NOT disagree with most of the theory of evolution.

"Intelligent Design is NOT Creationism" - M.J.Behe

[js1138]

Argument from Majority opinion is invalid.

Argument from results is not. Name one useful medical product that was invented as a result of assuming humans are not biological cousins of other animals. Name one medical laboritory that does not first test medicines and procedures on animals.

It is interesting that for decades, medical laboratories tested on rats and mice (because the research was useful), and just within the last month we find we are more closely related to rats than to cats and dogs.