To: Diddle E. Squat
This isn't and either or situation. Bush has 55 votes to confirm his judges -- even the most "controversial" nominees. Frist needs to stop the filibuster by scheduling a vote to end filibusters for judicial nominees, which requires a simple majority vote to change the Senate rules. He won't do it because of the White House's concern that other legislative matters would be lost to an angry debate, and the president doesn't want the showdown prior to the election. This should be an occasion for victory, to tell the people what the left has been doing, and to urge voters to elect more senators on these grounds alone.
To: holdonnow
This isn't and either or situation. Bush has 55 votes to confirm his judges -- even the most "controversial" nominees. Frist needs to stop the filibuster by scheduling a vote to end filibusters for judicial nominees, which requires a simple majority vote to change the Senate rules.??????
I was under the impression that rules changes could be filibustered as well. If you're right, I learned something new.
22 posted on
08/07/2003 2:29:52 PM PDT by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
To: holdonnow
Good points, thanks for taking the time to post.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson