Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scott from the Left Coast
What I'd like to know is what was so bad about Nixon's strategy in '72 anyway????

Nothing, he kicked McGovern's rear end, but that isn't what Nixon will be known for. He will always be known for Watergate and to the casual non-political listener of Rush it could be construed that the casual non-political listener says to themselves, Nixon-Bush connection, "Watergate-Bush is also a liar, yada, yada, yada.."

That's why I think the Rush's Bush-Nixon connection is not only factually wrong, but also disingenuous.

53 posted on 07/30/2003 7:14:58 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
Rush has casual, non-political listeners? Rush never fails to make his preferences known during an election...he backed Dole. I doubt strongly that Rush will sit on the fence in Bush v. Dean, or Bush v. Liebermann, or certainly Bush v. Clinton. Those casual, non-political listeners will know exactly where he stands on the election, when they're paying attention.

I think it's a bit of a stretch to say he's trying to harm Bush electorally. He may be trying to prod him policy-wise, but I can't imagine his problems with Bush running that deep.

57 posted on 07/30/2003 7:23:08 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson