Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChiefsMan
No, the answer was in the article in the WSJ, by the DSL leaders. They said that the move to the left was damaging all the centrist positioning that Clinton did and that it would split up the coalition of voters that made up the base that elected Clinton.
41 posted on 07/25/2003 12:49:26 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Eva
The current Democratic campaign has the following effects from my perspective:

Since Hillary continued to bash Bush not taking advantage. But Rockefeller is one of the few that are backing off and pronouncing reasonable statements, could this mean that the Clintons are backing Rockefeller? and that the set up was for Rockefeller's benefit? Is he from New York? Can he afford to buy the Clintons?

43 posted on 07/25/2003 1:00:15 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson