Rationality, logic and practicaility would say that actively sporting an antiwar position after the event is ... only for the myopic idealist.
It's one thing to assume a stance *prior* to an event, during it's debate, unless, of course, you're a strict policy wonk/practicing egghead and don't deal with the real world on any scale -
- WHICH a lot of these people simply don't ...
It's sad to see people we know are smarter than that, digging themselves into that hole.